GeForce 9800M GT
VS
Radeon HD 8510G

GeForce 9800M GT vs Radeon HD 8510G

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800M GT

2008Core: 500 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8510G

2012Boost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9800M GT is positioned at rank 622 and the Radeon HD 8510G is on rank 150, so the Radeon HD 8510G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800M GT

#612
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4562%
#614
4135%
#615
4124%
#619
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3750%
#620
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3725%
#622
GeForce 9800M GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $5
100%
#623
99%
#624
Radeon HD 8550G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
97%
#625
GeForce 8300 GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#626
95%
#627
95%
#628
GeForce 9500M GS
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
93%
#629
GeForce 8800 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
92%
#631
GeForce 9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $50
90%
#632
Mobility Radeon X1700
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
90%
#633
GeForce 9300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
89%
#634
Mobility Radeon HD 560v
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
89%
#635
GeForce 8400M G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
88%
#636
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
MSRP: $899|Avg: $400
88%
#637
GeForce 8400M GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8510G

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
875%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
841%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
831%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
829%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
828%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
823%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
813%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
810%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
802%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
800%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
790%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
789%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
774%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
774%
#87
Radeon RX 7500
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
99%
#88
Radeon Ryzen 5 5500H
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
97%
#89
Moore Threads MTT S70
MSRP: $345|Avg: $140
94%
#135
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
965%
#150
Radeon HD 8510G
MSRP: $45|Avg: $5
100%
#151
Radeon HD 8550G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
100%
#152
GeForce GT 635
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
99%
#154
Radeon R7 A8-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#155
Radeon HD 5670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
97%
#157
GeForce GT 740A
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
96%
#158
Radeon HD 7420G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
95%
#159
Radeon HD 7500G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
95%
#161
GeForce GT 430
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
92%
#164
91%
#165
Radeon HD 6520G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 9800M GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8510G.

InsightGeForce 9800M GTRadeon HD 8510G
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 9800M GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9800M GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $5), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 9800M GTRadeon HD 8510G
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9800M GT and Radeon HD 8510G

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800M GT

The GeForce 9800M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 8510G

The Radeon HD 8510G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 373 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9800M GT scores 381 and the Radeon HD 8510G reaches 373 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800M GT is built on G9x while the Radeon HD 8510G uses GCN 1.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800M GT) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8510G).

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTRadeon HD 8510G
G3D Mark Score
381+2%
373
Architecture
G9x
GCN 1.0
Process Node
65 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
224
1024+357%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTRadeon HD 8510G
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTRadeon HD 8510G
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9800M GT) vs 11_0 (Radeon HD 8510G). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTRadeon HD 8510G
DirectX
10.0
11_0+10%
OpenGL
3.3
4.4+33%
Max Displays
1
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9800M GT) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 8510G). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9800M GT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon HD 8510G).

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTRadeon HD 8510G
Encoder
No
UVD 3
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
UVD 3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9800M GT draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 8510G's 130W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8510G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800M GT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8510G). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTRadeon HD 8510G
TDP
150W
130W-13%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
2.5
2.9+16%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 9800M GT launched at $160 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the Radeon HD 8510G launched at $45 and now averages $5. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 76.2 (GeForce 9800M GT) vs 74.6 (Radeon HD 8510G) — the GeForce 9800M GT offers 2.1% better value. The Radeon HD 8510G is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTRadeon HD 8510G
MSRP
$160
$45-72%
Avg Price (30d)
$5
$5
Performance per Dollar
76.2+2%
74.6
Codename
NB9E-GTX
Pitcairn
Release
July 15 2008
March 5 2012
Ranking
#825
#503