
GeForce 9800M GT

Quadro FX 3700
GeForce 9800M GT vs Quadro FX 3700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9800M GT vs Quadro FX 3700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9800M GT vs Quadro FX 3700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9800M GT
2008Why buy it
- ✅18.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,439 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 923.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($160 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 189W, a 39W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 3700
2008Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) on 55nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9800M GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌899.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,599 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ❌26% higher power demand at 189W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9800M GT vs Quadro FX 3700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9800M GT
The GeForce 9800M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points.

Quadro FX 3700
The Quadro FX 3700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9800M GT scores 381 and the Quadro FX 3700 reaches 372 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800M GT is built on G9x while the Quadro FX 3700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800M GT) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3700).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GT | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 381+2% | 372 |
| Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 240+7% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9800M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 3700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GT | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9800M GT and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3700.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GT | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9800M GT) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 3700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GT | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10_0 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9800M GT draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 3700's 189W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 9800M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800M GT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3700). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GT | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-21% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.5+25% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9800M GT came in at $160, while the Quadro FX 3700 launched at $1599. On MSRP, GeForce 9800M GT was 90% cheaper ($1439 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (GeForce 9800M GT) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 3700) — the GeForce 9800M GT offers 1100% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GT | Quadro FX 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-90% | $1599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.4+1100% | 0.2 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GT200B |
| Release | July 15 2008 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #825 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














