GeForce 9800M GT
VS
Quadro FX 3700

GeForce 9800M GT vs Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800M GT

2008Core: 500 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3700

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9800M GT is positioned at rank 622 and the Quadro FX 3700 is on rank 401, so the Quadro FX 3700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800M GT

#612
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4562%
#614
4135%
#615
4124%
#619
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3750%
#620
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3725%
#622
GeForce 9800M GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $5
100%
#623
99%
#624
Radeon HD 8550G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
97%
#625
GeForce 8300 GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#626
95%
#627
95%
#628
GeForce 9500M GS
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
93%
#629
GeForce 8800 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
92%
#631
GeForce 9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $50
90%
#632
Mobility Radeon X1700
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
90%
#633
GeForce 9300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
89%
#634
Mobility Radeon HD 560v
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
89%
#635
GeForce 8400M G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
88%
#636
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
MSRP: $899|Avg: $400
88%
#637
GeForce 8400M GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3700

#385
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
64230%
#400
Quadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15
100%
#401
Quadro FX 3700
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500
100%
#402
GRID M10-0B
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000
96%
#403
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
87%
#405
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
87%
#406
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
78%
#408
Quadro FX 3500
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
74%
#409
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
70%
#410
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
70%
#412
GRID P4-1Q
MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185
52%
#413
GRID RTX6000-2Q
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500
43%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 9800M GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 3700.

InsightGeForce 9800M GTQuadro FX 3700
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 9800M GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9800M GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $500), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 10141.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 9800M GTQuadro FX 3700
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+10141.9%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9800M GT and Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800M GT

The GeForce 9800M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3700

The Quadro FX 3700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9800M GT scores 381 and the Quadro FX 3700 reaches 372 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800M GT is built on G9x while the Quadro FX 3700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800M GT) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3700).

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTQuadro FX 3700
G3D Mark Score
381+2%
372
Architecture
G9x
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
65 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
224
240+7%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTQuadro FX 3700
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTQuadro FX 3700
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9800M GT) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 3700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTQuadro FX 3700
DirectX
10.0
10_0
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9800M GT draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 3700's 189W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 9800M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800M GT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3700). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTQuadro FX 3700
TDP
150W-21%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
2.5+25%
2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 9800M GT launched at $160 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the Quadro FX 3700 launched at $1599 and now averages $500. The GeForce 9800M GT costs 99% less ($495 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 76.2 (GeForce 9800M GT) vs 0.7 (Quadro FX 3700) — the GeForce 9800M GT offers 10785.7% better value.

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTQuadro FX 3700
MSRP
$160-90%
$1599
Avg Price (30d)
$5-99%
$500
Performance per Dollar
76.2+10786%
0.7
Codename
NB9E-GTX
GT200B
Release
July 15 2008
November 11 2008
Ranking
#825
#815