GeForce 9800M GTS
VS
FirePro 3D V3750

GeForce 9800M GTS vs FirePro 3D V3750

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800M GTS

2008Core: 500 MHz
VS

FirePro 3D V3750

2014Core: 850 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9800M GTS is positioned at rank 658 and the FirePro 3D V3750 is on rank 307, so the FirePro 3D V3750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800M GTS

#646
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
6065%
#648
5498%
#649
5484%
#653
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
4987%
#654
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
4953%
#656
GeForce 8600 GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#657
100%
#658
GeForce 9800M GTS
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
100%
#659
Radeon HD 2900 GT
MSRP: $170|Avg: $15
96%
#660
Radeon HD 8280E
MSRP: $150|Avg: $110
96%
#661
Radeon R5 M420
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
94%
#662
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
94%
#663
Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
93%
#664
Mobility Radeon 4100
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
92%
#665
Radeon HD 2900 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
92%
#666
GeForce 9300 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
92%
#667
GeForce 9700M GT
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
92%
#668
Mobility Radeon X2500
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
92%
#669
GeForce 9800M GTX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $30
84%
#670
Radeon HD 7520G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $57
84%
#671
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3750

#116
Radeon Pro SSG
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500
92%
#292
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
8639%
#307
FirePro 3D V3750
MSRP: $199|Avg: $25
100%
#309
NVS 810
MSRP: $700|Avg: $80
99%
#310
GRID P40-2Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340
98%
#311
Quadro 2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
96%
#312
FirePro 3D V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30
95%
#313
Quadro K5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60
94%
#314
Quadro 2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
92%
#315
FirePro S7150
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459
92%
#317
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
90%
#318
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
89%
#319
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
89%
#320
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
89%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
88%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The FirePro 3D V3750 is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The FirePro 3D V3750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9800M GTS lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 9800M GTS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V3750.

InsightGeForce 9800M GTSFirePro 3D V3750
Performance
Leading raw performance (+4.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 9800M GTS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9800M GTS holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $25), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 74.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 9800M GTSFirePro 3D V3750
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+74.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9800M GTS and FirePro 3D V3750

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800M GTS

The GeForce 9800M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 357 points.

AMD

FirePro 3D V3750

The FirePro 3D V3750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9800M GTS scores 357 and the FirePro 3D V3750 reaches 341 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800M GTS is built on G9x while the FirePro 3D V3750 uses GCN 1.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800M GTS) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3750).

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTSFirePro 3D V3750
G3D Mark Score
357+5%
341
Architecture
G9x
GCN 1.0
Process Node
65 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
224
2048+814%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTSFirePro 3D V3750
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9800M GTS comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V3750 has 256 MB. The GeForce 9800M GTS offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTSFirePro 3D V3750
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9800M GTS) vs 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3750). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTSFirePro 3D V3750
DirectX
10.0
10.1
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9800M GTS) vs UVD 2.2 (FirePro 3D V3750). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9800M GTS) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V3750).

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTSFirePro 3D V3750
Encoder
No
UVD 2.2
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
UVD 2.2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9800M GTS draws 150W versus the FirePro 3D V3750's 274W — a 58.5% difference. The GeForce 9800M GTS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800M GTS) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V3750). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTSFirePro 3D V3750
TDP
150W-45%
274W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
90°C
70°C-22%
Perf/Watt
2.4+100%
1.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 9800M GTS launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the FirePro 3D V3750 launched at $199 and now averages $25. The GeForce 9800M GTS costs 40% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.8 (GeForce 9800M GTS) vs 13.6 (FirePro 3D V3750) — the GeForce 9800M GTS offers 75% better value. The FirePro 3D V3750 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTSFirePro 3D V3750
MSRP
$200
$199
Avg Price (30d)
$15-40%
$25
Performance per Dollar
23.8+75%
13.6
Codename
NB9E-GTX
Tahiti
Release
July 15 2008
January 18 2014
Ranking
#825
#423