GeForce 9800M GTS vs GeForce GT 705
GeForce 9800M GTS
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 705
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9800M GTS is positioned at rank 658 and the GeForce GT 705 is on rank 199, so the GeForce GT 705 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800M GTS
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 705
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GT 705 is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The GeForce GT 705 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9800M GTS lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 705 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9800M GTS.
| Insight | GeForce 9800M GTS | GeForce GT 705 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 705 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 705 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 3.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9800M GTS | GeForce GT 705 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9800M GTS and GeForce GT 705
GeForce 9800M GTS
The GeForce 9800M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 357 points.
GeForce GT 705
The GeForce GT 705 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 370 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9800M GTS scores 357 and the GeForce GT 705 reaches 370 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800M GTS is built on G9x while the GeForce GT 705 uses Kepler, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800M GTS) vs 384 (GeForce GT 705).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTS | GeForce GT 705 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 357 | 370+4% |
| Architecture | G9x | Kepler |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 384+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTS | GeForce GT 705 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9800M GTS comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 705 has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 705 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTS | GeForce GT 705 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9800M GTS) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 705). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTS | GeForce GT 705 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.0+10% |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.1+24% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9800M GTS) vs No (GeForce GT 705). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9800M GTS) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 705).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTS | GeForce GT 705 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9800M GTS draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 705's 64W — a 80.4% difference. The GeForce GT 705 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800M GTS) vs 250W (GeForce GT 705). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTS | GeForce GT 705 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 64W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 0mm | 145mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 65°C-28% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.4 | 5.8+142% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9800M GTS launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GT 705 launched at $60 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.8 (GeForce 9800M GTS) vs 24.7 (GeForce GT 705) — the GeForce GT 705 offers 3.8% better value. The GeForce GT 705 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTS | GeForce GT 705 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $60-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.8 | 24.7+4% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GK107 |
| Release | July 15 2008 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #825 | #777 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9800M GTS and GeForce GT 705
