CPU
GPU
GeForce 9800M GTS
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9800M GTS is positioned at rank 658 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is on rank 620, so the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800M GTS
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3850
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9800M GTS.
| Insight | GeForce 9800M GTS | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 3850 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9800M GTS | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9800M GTS and Mobility Radeon HD 3850
GeForce 9800M GTS
The GeForce 9800M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 357 points.
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
The Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 366 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9800M GTS scores 357 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 reaches 366 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800M GTS is built on G9x while the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 uses TeraScale 2, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800M GTS) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3850).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTS | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 357 | 366+3% |
| Architecture | G9x | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 800+257% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTS | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTS | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9800M GTS draws 150W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3850's 50W — a 100% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800M GTS) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3850). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTS | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.4 | 7.3+204% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9800M GTS launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 launched at $150 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.8 (GeForce 9800M GTS) vs 24.4 (Mobility Radeon HD 3850) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 offers 2.5% better value. The Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTS | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $150-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.8 | 24.4+3% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | Broadway |
| Release | July 15 2008 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #825 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9800M GTS and Mobility Radeon HD 3850
