GeForce 9800M GTX vs FirePro V5700
GeForce 9800M GTX
Popular choices:
FirePro V5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9800M GTX is positioned at rank 671 and the FirePro V5700 is on rank 368, so the FirePro V5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800M GTX
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9800M GTX.
| Insight | GeForce 9800M GTX | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro V5700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro V5700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $30), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 53.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9800M GTX | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+53.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9800M GTX and FirePro V5700
GeForce 9800M GTX
The GeForce 9800M GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 454 points.
FirePro V5700
The FirePro V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 465 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9800M GTX scores 454 and the FirePro V5700 reaches 465 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800M GTX is built on G9x while the FirePro V5700 uses TeraScale 3, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs 1,280 (FirePro V5700).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTX | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 454 | 465+2% |
| Architecture | G9x | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 1280+471% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTX | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9800M GTX comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V5700 has 4 GB. The FirePro V5700 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTX | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs 10.1 (FirePro V5700). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTX | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs None (FirePro V5700). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro V5700).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTX | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9800M GTX draws 150W versus the FirePro V5700's 150W — a 0% difference. The FirePro V5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs 350W (FirePro V5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTX | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 75-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.0 | 3.1+3% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9800M GTX launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FirePro V5700 launched at $599 and now averages $20. The FirePro V5700 costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.1 (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs 23.3 (FirePro V5700) — the FirePro V5700 offers 54.3% better value. The FirePro V5700 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9800M GTX | FirePro V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-50% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $20-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.1 | 23.3+54% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | Cayman |
| Release | July 15 2008 | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #825 | #656 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9800M GTX and FirePro V5700
