GeForce 9800M GTX
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce 9800M GTX vs GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800M GTX

2008Core: 500 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 9800M GTX is positioned at rank #671 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800M GTX

#661
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
7190%
#663
6518%
#664
6501%
#668
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
5911%
#669
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
5871%
#671
GeForce 9800M GTX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $30
100%
#672
Radeon HD 7520G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $57
100%
#673
99%
#674
GeForce 505
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
96%
#675
GeForce 9200M GE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
95%
#676
Mobility Radeon. HD 5470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
95%
#677
Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $40
94%
#678
GeForce 7500 LE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
94%
#679
GeForce 9650M GT
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
91%
#680
GeForce 8400 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
90%
#681
GeForce 9650M GS
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
90%
#682
GeForce 8400M GT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $30
89%
#683
GeForce 9200M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
85%
#684
Mobility Radeon HD 3410
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
85%
#685
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
81%
#686
GeForce 9300M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
78%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9800M GTX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1633.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9800M GTX.

InsightGeForce 9800M GTXGeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1633.3%)
Leading raw performance (+1633.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 593.3% better value per dollar than the GeForce 9800M GTX.

InsightGeForce 9800M GTXGeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+593.3%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9800M GTX and GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800M GTX

The GeForce 9800M GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 454 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9800M GTX scores 454 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1633.3%. The GeForce 9800M GTX is built on G9x while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 65 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTXGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
454
7,869+1633%
Architecture
G9x
Turing
Process Node
65 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
224
896+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTXGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9800M GTX comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTXGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
128 GB/s
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: None vs 1.4. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTXGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
10.0
12+20%
Vulkan
None
1.4
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
1
3+200%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTXGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
No
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9800M GTX draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTXGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
150W
75W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
70°C-22%
Perf/Watt
3.0
104.9+3397%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 9800M GTX launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce 9800M GTX costs 60% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.1 (GeForce 9800M GTX) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 594.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9800M GTXGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$300
$149-50%
Avg Price (30d)
$30-60%
$75
Performance per Dollar
15.1
104.9+595%
Codename
NB9E-GTX
TU117
Release
July 15 2008
April 23 2019
Ranking
#825
#323