GeForce FX 5500 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce FX 5500
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce FX 5500 is positioned at rank #736 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5500
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 394625% higher G3D Mark score and 4700% more VRAM (12 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5500.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-394625%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+394625%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 19970.8% better value per dollar than the GeForce FX 5500.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+19970.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5500 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce FX 5500
The GeForce FX 5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5500 scores 8 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 394625%. The GeForce FX 5500 is built on Rankine while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce FX 5500) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5500) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1320 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8 | 31,578+394625% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 7680+650% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+1383% |
| Boost Clock | 1320 MHz | 2610 MHz+98% |
| ROPs | 16 | 80+400% |
| TMUs | 32 | 240+650% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 7.5 MB+275% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce FX 5500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5500 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 4700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5500) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 12 GB+4700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5500) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 12 Ultimate+33% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 4.6+207% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce FX 5500) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: No vs NVDEC (5th Gen).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | No | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5500 draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 167.7% difference. The GeForce FX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5500) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 171mm vs 285mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-91% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 171mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 110.8+36833% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5500 launched at $37 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The GeForce FX 5500 costs 94.9% less ($560 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (GeForce FX 5500) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 17733.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $37-95% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-95% | $590 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 53.5+17733% |
| Codename | TU117S | AD104 |
| Release | December 17 2021 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #468 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX 5500 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
