
GeForce FX 5900ZT

GeForce PCX 5750
GeForce FX 5900ZT vs GeForce PCX 5750 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5900ZT vs GeForce PCX 5750 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX 5900ZT vs GeForce PCX 5750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5900ZT
2011Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 365W vs 219W.
- ❌29.8% longer card at 218mm vs 168mm.
GeForce PCX 5750
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 219W instead of 365W, a 146W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 218mm, a 50mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5900ZT vs GeForce PCX 5750 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5900ZT
The GeForce FX 5900ZT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce PCX 5750
The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5900ZT scores 33 versus the GeForce PCX 5750's 35 — the GeForce PCX 5750 leads by 6.1%. The GeForce FX 5900ZT is built on Rankine while the GeForce PCX 5750 uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs 480 (GeForce PCX 5750). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900ZT | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 33 | 35+6% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 ×2+113% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 | 1.405 TFLOPS+13% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2+20% | 40 |
| TMUs | 64 ×2+7% | 60 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+6% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+20% | 640 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900ZT | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 128 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5900ZT and 128-bit on the GeForce PCX 5750. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs 640 KB (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce FX 5900ZT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900ZT | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+20% | 640 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5750). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900ZT | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0a |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 2.1+40% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs None (GeForce PCX 5750). Decoder: None vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce PCX 5750).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900ZT | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | None | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5900ZT draws 365W versus the GeForce PCX 5750's 219W — a 50% difference. The GeForce PCX 5750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs 350W (GeForce PCX 5750). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 218mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900ZT | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 365W | 219W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 218mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70-13% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.2+100% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5900ZT came in at $0, while the GeForce PCX 5750 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5900ZT was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs 0.2 (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce FX 5900ZT offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5900ZT (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5900ZT | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.2 |
| Codename | GF110 | GF110 |
| Release | March 24 2011 | December 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #555 | #497 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














