GeForce FX 5900ZT
VS
GeForce PCX 5900

GeForce FX 5900ZT vs GeForce PCX 5900

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5900ZT

2011Core: 607 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce PCX 5900

2011Core: 607 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce PCX 5900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (256 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5900ZT.

InsightGeForce FX 5900ZTGeForce PCX 5900
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3%)
Leading raw performance (+3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce PCX 5900 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5900ZT and GeForce PCX 5900

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5900ZT

The GeForce FX 5900ZT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

GeForce PCX 5900

The GeForce PCX 5900 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $699.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce FX 5900ZT scores 33 and the GeForce PCX 5900 reaches 34 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX 5900ZT is built on Rankine while the GeForce PCX 5900 uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs 1,024 (GeForce PCX 5900). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce PCX 5900).

FeatureGeForce FX 5900ZTGeForce PCX 5900
G3D Mark Score
33
34+3%
Architecture
Rankine
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1024 ×2
1024 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.244 TFLOPS ×2
1.244 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs
48 ×2
48 ×2
TMUs
64 ×2
64 ×2
L1 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
768 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX 5900ZTGeForce PCX 5900
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5900ZT comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce PCX 5900 has 256 MB. The GeForce PCX 5900 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce FX 5900ZTGeForce PCX 5900
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.25 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB
768 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5900ZT draws 365W versus the GeForce PCX 5900's 365W — a 0% difference. The GeForce PCX 5900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs 350W (GeForce PCX 5900). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce FX 5900ZTGeForce PCX 5900
TDP
365W
365W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
218mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce FX 5900ZT launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce PCX 5900 launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce FX 5900ZT) vs Infinity (GeForce PCX 5900) — the GeForce PCX 5900 offers NaN% better value.

FeatureGeForce FX 5900ZTGeForce PCX 5900
MSRP
$0
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
GF110
GF110
Release
March 24 2011
March 24 2011
Ranking
#555
#555