GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go5300

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX Go5300

2025

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 666.7% higher power demand at 575W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 6866.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 575W, a 500W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6866.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 60430.8% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 13), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX Go5300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 12nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce FX Go5300 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX Go5300 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go5300

The GeForce FX Go5300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13 points. Launch price was $1,999.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX Go5300 scores 13 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 60430.8%. The GeForce FX Go5300 is built on Rankine while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5300GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
13
7,869+60431%
Architecture
Rankine
Turing
Process Node
5 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
21760+2329%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
104.8 TFLOPS+3412%
2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2407 MHz+45%
1665 MHz
ROPs
176+450%
32
TMUs
680+1114%
56
L1 Cache
21.3 MB+2320%
0.88 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB+9500%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX Go5300GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX Go5300 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go5300 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce FX Go5300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5300GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
128 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
96 MB+9500%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5300GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
9.0a
12+33%
OpenGL
2.1
4.6+119%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VPE 3.0 (GeForce FX Go5300) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: VPE 3.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go5300) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce FX Go5300GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
VPE 3.0
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
VPE 3.0
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
MPEG-2
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX Go5300 draws 575W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 153.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5300) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5300GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
575W
75W-87%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Legacy
None
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
70°C-13%
Perf/Watt
0.0
104.9
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce FX Go5300 (2025 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce FX Go5300GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$149
Codename
GB202
TU117
Release
January 30 2025
April 23 2019
Ranking
#3
#323

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.