GeForce FX Go5650 vs RADEON 9800 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX Go5650 vs RADEON 9800 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX Go5650 vs RADEON 9800 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX Go5650

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (17 vs 24).
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.

RADEON 9800 SE

2025

Why buy it

✅+41.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON 9800 SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 41.2% in PassMark G3D (24 vs 17), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9800 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 40nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2011. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9800 SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce FX Go5650 vs RADEON 9800 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX Go5650

The GeForce FX Go5650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17 points. Launch price was $199.

RADEON 9800 SE

The RADEON 9800 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX Go5650 scores 17 versus the RADEON 9800 SE's 24 — the RADEON 9800 SE leads by 41.2%. The GeForce FX Go5650 is built on Rankine while the RADEON 9800 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce FX Go5650) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9800 SE). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5650) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800 SE).

Feature	GeForce FX Go5650	RADEON 9800 SE
G3D Mark Score	17	24+41%
Architecture	Rankine	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	40 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	336	2560+662%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.089 TFLOPS	14.85 TFLOPS+1264%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	160+186%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	8 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX Go5650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9800 SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce FX Go5650	RADEON 9800 SE
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX Go5650 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9800 SE carries 256 MB. GeForce FX Go5650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go5650 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9800 SE. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce FX Go5650) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9800 SE) — the RADEON 9800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX Go5650	RADEON 9800 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	8 MB+1500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX Go5650 draws 150W versus the RADEON 9800 SE's 55W — a 92.7% difference. The RADEON 9800 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5650) vs 350W (RADEON 9800 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce FX Go5650	RADEON 9800 SE
TDP	150W	55W-63%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.4+300%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON 9800 SE (2025 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce FX Go5650	RADEON 9800 SE
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GF114	Strix Halo
Release	May 17 2011	January 6 2025
Ranking	#605	#98

Search GeForce FX Go5650 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9800 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.