GeForce G 105M vs Quadro FX 350

NVIDIA

GeForce G 105M

2016Core: 1290 MHzBoost: 1392 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 350

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce G 105M vs Quadro FX 350 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G 105M vs Quadro FX 350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G 105M vs Quadro FX 350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G 105M

2016

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
  • Draws 60W instead of 189W, a 129W reduction.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quadro FX 350

2008

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 215% higher power demand at 189W vs 60W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce G 105M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 7% in PassMark G3D (92 vs 86), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce G 105M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 350 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce G 105M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce G 105M vs Quadro FX 350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce G 105M

The GeForce G 105M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points. Launch price was $109.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 350

The Quadro FX 350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 86 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce G 105M scores 92 versus the Quadro FX 350's 86 — the GeForce G 105M leads by 7%. The GeForce G 105M is built on Pascal while the Quadro FX 350 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce G 105M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350). Raw compute: 1.862 TFLOPS (GeForce G 105M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350).

FeatureGeForce G 105MQuadro FX 350
G3D Mark Score
92+7%
86
Architecture
Pascal
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
640+167%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.862 TFLOPS+199%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
40
80+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G 105M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 350 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce G 105MQuadro FX 350
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce G 105M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 350 carries 128 MB. GeForce G 105M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G 105M and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G 105M) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 350) — the GeForce G 105M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce G 105MQuadro FX 350
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+300%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G 105M draws 60W versus the Quadro FX 350's 189W — a 103.6% difference. The GeForce G 105M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G 105M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce G 105MQuadro FX 350
TDP
60W-68%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
1.5+200%
0.5
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce G 105M (2016 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce G 105MQuadro FX 350
MSRP
$199
Codename
GP107
GT200B
Release
October 25 2016
November 11 2008
Ranking
#443
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.