GeForce G 105M vs Radeon X1650 Pro

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G 105M vs Radeon X1650 Pro FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G 105M vs Radeon X1650 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G 105M

2016

Why buy it

✅+8.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Draws 60W instead of 250W, a 190W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon X1650 Pro

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (85 vs 92).
❌316.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 60W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce G 105M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 8.2% in PassMark G3D (92 vs 85), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon X1650 Pro is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 14nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon X1650 Pro makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce G 105M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce G 105M vs Radeon X1650 Pro Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G 105M

The GeForce G 105M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points. Launch price was $109.

Radeon X1650 Pro

The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce G 105M scores 92 versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 85 — the GeForce G 105M leads by 8.2%. The GeForce G 105M is built on Pascal while the Radeon X1650 Pro uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce G 105M) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 2581 MHz.

Feature	GeForce G 105M	Radeon X1650 Pro
G3D Mark Score	92+8%	85
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	640	2560+300%
Boost Clock	1392 MHz	2581 MHz+85%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	40	160+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G 105M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1650 Pro leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce G 105M	Radeon X1650 Pro
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G 105M and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 Pro.

Feature	GeForce G 105M	Radeon X1650 Pro
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G 105M draws 60W versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 250W — a 122.6% difference. The GeForce G 105M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G 105M) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce G 105M	Radeon X1650 Pro
TDP	60W-76%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	1.5+400%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon X1650 Pro (2023 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce G 105M	Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP	—	$100
Codename	GP107	Navi 22
Release	October 25 2016	October 17 2023
Ranking	#443	#92

Search GeForce G 105M on Amazon

Search Radeon X1650 Pro on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.