CPU
GPU
GeForce G 105M
Popular choices:
Radeon X1650 Pro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce G 105M is positioned at rank 242 and the Radeon X1650 Pro is on rank 334, so the GeForce G 105M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce G 105M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1650 Pro
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1650 Pro is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The Radeon X1650 Pro likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce G 105M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce G 105M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1650 Pro.
| Insight | GeForce G 105M | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce G 105M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce G 105M and Radeon X1650 Pro
GeForce G 105M
The GeForce G 105M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points. Launch price was $109.
Radeon X1650 Pro
The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce G 105M scores 92 versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 85 — the GeForce G 105M leads by 8.2%. The GeForce G 105M is built on Pascal while the Radeon X1650 Pro uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce G 105M) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 2581 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce G 105M | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 92+8% | 85 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2560+300% |
| Boost Clock | 1392 MHz | 2581 MHz+85% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 160+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce G 105M | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce G 105M | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce G 105M draws 60W versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 250W — a 122.6% difference. The GeForce G 105M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G 105M) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce G 105M | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W-76% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5+400% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1650 Pro is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce G 105M | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $15 |
| Codename | GP107 | Navi 22 |
| Release | October 25 2016 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #443 | #92 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce G 105M and Radeon X1650 Pro
