GeForce G102M vs GeForce 8500 GT

CPU

GPU

GeForce G102M

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz

GeForce 8500 GT

2008Core: 500 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce G102M

168

0.0%

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

GeForce 8500 GT

150

169

+0.6%

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce G102M is positioned at rank 156 and the GeForce 8500 GT is on rank 647, so the GeForce G102M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce G102M

#42

Radeon RX 6600S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

97%

#43

Radeon RX 8060S

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

95%

#146

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

323%

#148

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

293%

#149

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

292%

#153

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

266%

#154

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

264%

#156

GeForce G102M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#157

GeForce 830M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

100%

#158

GeForce GT 750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

99%

#159

GeForce GT 425M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8500 GT

#635

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

5714%

#637

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

5180%

#638

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

5166%

#642

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

4698%

#643

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

4666%

#645

Mobility Radeon HD 4270

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

100%

#646

GeForce 9500 GT

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

100%

#647

GeForce 8500 GT

MSRP: $89|Avg: $15

100%

#648

Mobility Radeon X1600

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

99%

#649

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

99%

#650

GeForce 9400M G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

99%

#651

GeForce 9600M GS

MSRP: $70|Avg: $20

98%

#652

Mobility Radeon HD 3470

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

98%

#653

Mobility Radeon HD 4200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $45

98%

#654

GeForce 8800 GT

MSRP: $249|Avg: $25

97%

#655

GeForce 8400

MSRP: $45|Avg: $5

95%

#656

GeForce 9800M GTS

MSRP: $200|Avg: $15

94%

#657

GeForce 8600 GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

94%

#658

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7600M Dual

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

94%

#659

Radeon HD 2900 GT

MSRP: $170|Avg: $15

91%

#660

Radeon HD 8280E

MSRP: $150|Avg: $110

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce G102M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The GeForce G102M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8500 GT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 8500 GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce G102M.

Insight	GeForce G102M	GeForce 8500 GT
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 8500 GT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce G102M Benchmark Check

GeForce 8500 GT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

No prediction data available

League of Legends

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce G102M and GeForce 8500 GT

GeForce G102M

The GeForce G102M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 168 points.

GeForce 8500 GT

The GeForce 8500 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 169 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce G102M scores 168 and the GeForce 8500 GT reaches 169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G102M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 8500 GT uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G102M) vs 224 (GeForce 8500 GT).

Feature	GeForce G102M	GeForce 8500 GT
G3D Mark Score	168	169
Architecture	Maxwell	G9x
Process Node	28 nm	65 nm
Shading Units	384+71%	224

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce G102M	GeForce 8500 GT
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce G102M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8500 GT has 1 GB. The GeForce 8500 GT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce G102M	GeForce 8500 GT
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce G102M) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8500 GT). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce G102M	GeForce 8500 GT
DirectX	10.0	10.0
Vulkan	None	None
OpenGL	4.0+21%	3.3
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce G102M) vs No (GeForce 8500 GT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce G102M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8500 GT).

Feature	GeForce G102M	GeForce 8500 GT
Encoder	No	No
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP3	PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G102M draws 33W versus the GeForce 8500 GT's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce G102M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G102M) vs 350W (GeForce 8500 GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 173mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.