GeForce Go 6100
VS
GeForce Go 6400

GeForce Go 6100 vs GeForce Go 6400

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6100

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6400

2012Core: 902 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 6100 is positioned at rank 344 and the GeForce Go 6400 is on rank 338, so the GeForce Go 6400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6100

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
12090%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
11615%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
11480%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
11460%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
11437%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
11372%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
11228%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
11187%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
11083%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
11053%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
10920%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
10897%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
10700%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
10693%
#329
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
13333%
#344
GeForce Go 6100
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#345
Radeon X1600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
97%
#346
Radeon X1300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $49
97%
#347
RADEON X800 GTO
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
97%
#348
Radeon X1800 GTO
MSRP: $249|Avg: $20
95%
#349
GeForce 7800 GT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $20
90%
#351
RADEON E2400
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
87%
#352
Radeon X1650 GTO
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
83%
#353
RADEON X800GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $10
83%
#354
RADEON X600 SE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
82%
#355
Radeon X1900 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $20
82%
#356
RADEON X700
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
82%
#357
GeForce G200
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
75%
#358
RADEON X700 PRO
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6400

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
9068%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
8711%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
8610%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
8595%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
8578%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
8529%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
8421%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
8390%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
8313%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
8290%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
8190%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
8172%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
8025%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
8020%
#323
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
10000%
#338
GeForce Go 6400
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#339
Radeon X1950 GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $49
95%
#340
GeForce 6600 GT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $50
90%
#341
RADEON X600 PRO
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
85%
#342
Radeon X1600 Pro
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
83%
#343
RADEON X300SE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $60
79%
#345
RADEON X800 GTO
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
72%
#346
Radeon X1600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
72%
#347
Radeon X1300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $49
72%
#348
Radeon X1800 GTO
MSRP: $249|Avg: $20
71%
#349
GeForce 7800 GT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $20
68%
#351
RADEON E2400
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
65%
#352
Radeon X1650 GTO
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
63%
#353
RADEON X800GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $10
63%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce Go 6400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce Go 6100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce Go 6100GeForce Go 6400
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)
Leading raw performance (+33.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+3025%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 6400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 6100 and GeForce Go 6400

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6100

The GeForce Go 6100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18 points. Launch price was $79.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6400

The GeForce Go 6400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points. Launch price was $99.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 6100 scores 18 versus the GeForce Go 6400's 24 — the GeForce Go 6400 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce Go 6100 is built on Pascal while the GeForce Go 6400 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 6100) vs 384 (GeForce Go 6400). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6100) vs 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6400).

FeatureGeForce Go 6100GeForce Go 6400
G3D Mark Score
18
24+33%
Architecture
Pascal
Kepler
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS+63%
0.6927 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
144 KB+350%
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce Go 6100GeForce Go 6400
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 6100 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 6400 has 16 MB. The GeForce Go 6100 offers 3025% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce Go 6100) vs 256 KB (GeForce Go 6400) — the GeForce Go 6100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 6100GeForce Go 6400
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+3025%
0.016 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0 (GeForce Go 6100) vs 10.0 (GeForce Go 6400). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce Go 6100GeForce Go 6400
DirectX
9.0
10.0+11%
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 6100) vs No (GeForce Go 6400). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV,H.264 (GeForce Go 6100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce Go 6400).

FeatureGeForce Go 6100GeForce Go 6400
Encoder
No
No
Decoder
PureVideo
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
MPEG-2,WMV,H.264
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 6100 draws 30W versus the GeForce Go 6400's 65W — a 73.7% difference. The GeForce Go 6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6100) vs 350W (GeForce Go 6400). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce Go 6100GeForce Go 6400
TDP
30W-54%
65W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
0.6+50%
0.4