GeForce Go 6100 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 6100 is positioned at rank 344 and the RADEON XPRESS 200M is on rank 225, so the RADEON XPRESS 200M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6100

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

12090%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

11615%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

11480%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

11460%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

11437%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

11372%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

11228%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

11187%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

11083%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

11053%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

10920%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

10897%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

10700%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

10693%

#329

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

13333%

#344

GeForce Go 6100

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#345

Radeon X1600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

97%

#346

Radeon X1300

MSRP: $100|Avg: $49

97%

#347

RADEON X800 GTO

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

97%

#348

Radeon X1800 GTO

MSRP: $249|Avg: $20

95%

#349

GeForce 7800 GT

MSRP: $449|Avg: $20

90%

#351

RADEON E2400

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

87%

#352

Radeon X1650 GTO

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

83%

#353

RADEON X800GT

MSRP: $160|Avg: $10

83%

#354

RADEON X600 SE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

82%

#355

Radeon X1900 GT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $20

82%

#356

RADEON X700

MSRP: $149|Avg: $10

82%

#357

GeForce G200

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

75%

#358

RADEON X700 PRO

MSRP: $179|Avg: $30

70%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON XPRESS 200M

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

96%

#96

L4

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

94%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

91%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

91%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

89%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

82%

#101

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

MSRP: $11605|Avg: $8199

79%

#210

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

3212%

#225

RADEON XPRESS 200M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#226

FirePro D500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

99%

#227

FirePro 3D V4800

MSRP: $189|Avg: $20

98%

#231

GRID T4-2Q

MSRP: $845|Avg: $600

94%

#238

FirePro 3D V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

80%

#240

Quadro K600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON XPRESS 200M uses modern memory architecture. The RADEON XPRESS 200M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 6100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 27.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 6100.

Insight	GeForce Go 6100	RADEON XPRESS 200M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-27.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+27.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON XPRESS 200M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce Go 6100 Benchmark Check

RADEON XPRESS 200M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 6100 and RADEON XPRESS 200M

GeForce Go 6100

The GeForce Go 6100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18 points. Launch price was $79.

RADEON XPRESS 200M

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 6100 scores 18 versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 23 — the RADEON XPRESS 200M leads by 27.8%. The GeForce Go 6100 is built on Pascal while the RADEON XPRESS 200M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 6100) vs 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6100) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

Feature	GeForce Go 6100	RADEON XPRESS 200M
G3D Mark Score	18	23+28%
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	2560+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS	5.274 TFLOPS+368%
Boost Clock	1468 MHz+43%	1030 MHz
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	24	160+567%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce Go 6100	RADEON XPRESS 200M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce Go 6100) vs 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) — the RADEON XPRESS 200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce Go 6100	RADEON XPRESS 200M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0 (GeForce Go 6100) vs 9_0 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce Go 6100	RADEON XPRESS 200M
DirectX	9.0	9_0
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 6100) vs None (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Decoder: PureVideo vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV,H.264 (GeForce Go 6100) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON XPRESS 200M).

Feature	GeForce Go 6100	RADEON XPRESS 200M
Encoder	No	None
Decoder	PureVideo	MPEG-2
Codecs	MPEG-2,WMV,H.264	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 6100 draws 30W versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 50W — a 50% difference. The GeForce Go 6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6100) vs 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.