GeForce Go 6200 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6200

2012Core: 902 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce Go 6200 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 6200 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 6200 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 6200

2012

Why buy it

  • +87.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Draws 65W instead of 189W, a 124W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 16 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 16 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

2008

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 24900% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (8 vs 15).
  • 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 190.8% higher power demand at 189W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce Go 6200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 87.5% in PassMark G3D (15 vs 8), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce Go 6200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 500/FX 600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce Go 6200 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 6200 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6200

The GeForce Go 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15 points. Launch price was $99.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 6200 scores 15 versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 8 — the GeForce Go 6200 leads by 87.5%. The GeForce Go 6200 is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 6200) vs 240 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6200) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/FX 600).

FeatureGeForce Go 6200Quadro FX 500/FX 600
G3D Mark Score
15+88%
8
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+60%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6927 TFLOPS+11%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
80+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 6200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce Go 6200Quadro FX 500/FX 600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 6200 has 16 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 500/FX 600 gives you 24900% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6200 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 500/FX 600.

FeatureGeForce Go 6200Quadro FX 500/FX 600
VRAM Capacity
0.016 GB
4 GB+24900%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 6200 draws 65W versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 189W — a 97.6% difference. The GeForce Go 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6200) vs 350W (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce Go 6200Quadro FX 500/FX 600
TDP
65W-66%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce Go 6200 (2012 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce Go 6200Quadro FX 500/FX 600
MSRP
$449
Codename
GK107
GT200B
Release
June 5 2012
November 11 2008
Ranking
#837
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.