GeForce FX 5600 vs GeForce Go 6200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5600 vs GeForce Go 6200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX 5600 vs GeForce Go 6200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5600
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅1462.5% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13 vs 15).
- ❌2011 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
GeForce Go 6200
2012Why buy it
- ✅+15.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 16 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5600 vs GeForce Go 6200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5600
The GeForce FX 5600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce Go 6200
The GeForce Go 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5600 scores 13 versus the GeForce Go 6200's 15 — the GeForce Go 6200 leads by 15.4%. The GeForce FX 5600 is built on Rankine while the GeForce Go 6200 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce FX 5600) vs 384 (GeForce Go 6200). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5600) vs 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6200).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 | GeForce Go 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13 | 15+15% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 336 | 384+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.089 TFLOPS+57% | 0.6927 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+75% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+1300% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 | GeForce Go 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5600 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 6200 carries 16 MB. GeForce FX 5600 gives you 1462.5% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5600 and 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6200. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce FX 5600) vs 256 KB (GeForce Go 6200) — the GeForce FX 5600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 | GeForce Go 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+1462% | 0.016 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5600) vs 10.0 (GeForce Go 6200). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 | GeForce Go 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 10.0+11% |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 2.1+40% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce FX 5600) vs No (GeForce Go 6200). Decoder: No vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce Go 6200).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 | GeForce Go 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | No | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5600 draws 150W versus the GeForce Go 6200's 65W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce Go 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5600) vs 350W (GeForce Go 6200). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 180mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 | GeForce Go 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 65W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 180mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.2+100% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce Go 6200 (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 | GeForce Go 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | — |
| Codename | GF114 | GK107 |
| Release | May 17 2011 | June 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #605 | #837 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














