GeForce FX 5600 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600
GeForce FX 5600
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce FX 5600 is positioned at rank 380 and the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is on rank 425, so the GeForce FX 5600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5600
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 500/FX 600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 62.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5600 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+62.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-62.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+1500%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce FX 5600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce FX 5600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 143.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5600 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+143.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5600 and Quadro FX 500/FX 600
GeForce FX 5600
The GeForce FX 5600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13 points. Launch price was $199.
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5600 scores 13 versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 8 — the GeForce FX 5600 leads by 62.5%. The GeForce FX 5600 is built on Rankine while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce FX 5600) vs 240 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5600) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/FX 600).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13+63% | 8 |
| Architecture | Rankine | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 336+40% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.089 TFLOPS+75% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5600 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce FX 5600) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) — the GeForce FX 5600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 4 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5600 draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 189W — a 23% difference. The GeForce FX 5600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5600) vs 350W (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-21% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 180mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5600 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 launched at $449 and now averages $15. The GeForce FX 5600 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.3 (GeForce FX 5600) vs 0.5 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) — the GeForce FX 5600 offers 160% better value. The GeForce FX 5600 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5600 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-55% | $449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.3+160% | 0.5 |
| Codename | GF114 | GT200B |
| Release | May 17 2011 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #605 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX 5600 and Quadro FX 500/FX 600
