GeForce Go 6200 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M
GeForce Go 6200
Popular choices:
RADEON XPRESS 200M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 6200 is positioned at rank 325 and the RADEON XPRESS 200M is on rank 225, so the RADEON XPRESS 200M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6200
Performance Per Dollar RADEON XPRESS 200M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON XPRESS 200M is significantly newer (2020 vs 2012). The RADEON XPRESS 200M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 6200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON XPRESS 200M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 53.3% higher G3D Mark score and 3025% more VRAM (512 MB vs 16 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 6200.
| Insight | GeForce Go 6200 | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-53.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+53.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+3025%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON XPRESS 200M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 6200 and RADEON XPRESS 200M
GeForce Go 6200
The GeForce Go 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15 points. Launch price was $99.
RADEON XPRESS 200M
The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 6200 scores 15 versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 23 — the RADEON XPRESS 200M leads by 53.3%. The GeForce Go 6200 is built on Kepler while the RADEON XPRESS 200M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 6200) vs 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6200) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6200 | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15 | 23+53% |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6927 TFLOPS | 5.274 TFLOPS+661% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 160+400% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 6200 | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 6200 comes with 16 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON XPRESS 200M has 512 MB. The RADEON XPRESS 200M offers 3025% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce Go 6200) vs 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) — the RADEON XPRESS 200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6200 | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.016 GB | 0.5 GB+3025% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce Go 6200) vs 9_0 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6200 | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0+11% | 9_0 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 6200) vs None (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce Go 6200) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON XPRESS 200M).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6200 | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | MPEG-2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 6200 draws 65W versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 50W — a 26.1% difference. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6200) vs 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6200 | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 50W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.5+150% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce Go 6200 and RADEON XPRESS 200M
