GeForce Go 7600 GT
VS
GeForce GT 230M

GeForce Go 7600 GT vs GeForce GT 230M

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7600 GT

2013Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 230M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 7600 GT is positioned at rank 331 and the GeForce GT 230M is on rank 95, so the GeForce GT 230M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7600 GT

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
6843%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
6575%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
6498%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
6487%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
6474%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
6437%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
6356%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
6332%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
6274%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
6257%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
6181%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
6168%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
6057%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
6053%
#316
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
7547%
#331
GeForce Go 7600 GT
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#334
Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
80%
#336
RADEON X550
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
80%
#337
Radeon HD 8350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $39
77%
#339
Radeon X1950 GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $49
72%
#340
GeForce 6600 GT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $50
68%
#341
RADEON X600 PRO
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
64%
#342
Radeon X1600 Pro
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
62%
#343
RADEON X300SE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $60
59%
#345
RADEON X800 GTO
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
55%
#346
Radeon X1600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
55%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 230M

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
504%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
484%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
478%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
478%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
477%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
474%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
468%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
466%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
462%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
461%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
455%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
454%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
446%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
446%
#79
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
556%
#80
GeForce RTX 5090
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700
100%
#81
Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP: $260|Avg: $170
96%
#82
Intel UHD Graphics P750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
86%
#83
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $100
85%
#95
GeForce GT 230M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#96
Radeon R7 A8-7690K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
99%
#97
GeForce GT 1010
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
96%
#98
Radeon R7 430
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
96%
#100
Radeon 550X
MSRP: $109|Avg: $45
94%
#101
GeForce GT 720
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
93%
#102
Radeon R7 240
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
91%
#103
Radeon R7 G
MSRP: $69|Avg: $51
88%
#106
Radeon R7 250
MSRP: $89|Avg: $25
82%
#107
GeForce GT 640
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
82%
#108
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 230M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (1 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7600 GT.

InsightGeForce Go 7600 GTGeForce GT 230M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)
Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 230M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 7600 GT and GeForce GT 230M

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7600 GT

The GeForce Go 7600 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points. Launch price was $249.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 230M

The GeForce GT 230M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 7600 GT scores 210 and the GeForce GT 230M reaches 216 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7600 GT is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 230M uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce Go 7600 GT) vs 384 (GeForce GT 230M). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7600 GT) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 230M). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

FeatureGeForce Go 7600 GTGeForce GT 230M
G3D Mark Score
210
216+3%
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1152+200%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.378 TFLOPS+111%
1.127 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1468 MHz+42%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
96+300%
24
L1 Cache
96 KB
144 KB+50%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce Go 7600 GTGeForce GT 230M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 7600 GT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 230M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 230M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce Go 7600 GTGeForce GT 230M
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
1 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7600 GT) vs 10.1 (GeForce GT 230M). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce Go 7600 GTGeForce GT 230M
DirectX
9.0c
10.1+12%
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
2.1
3.3+57%
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo (GeForce Go 7600 GT) vs No (GeForce GT 230M). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2 (GeForce Go 7600 GT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 230M).

FeatureGeForce Go 7600 GTGeForce GT 230M
Encoder
PureVideo
No
Decoder
PureVideo
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7600 GT draws 170W versus the GeForce GT 230M's 30W — a 140% difference. The GeForce GT 230M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7600 GT) vs 350W (GeForce GT 230M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce Go 7600 GTGeForce GT 230M
TDP
170W
30W-82%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
1.2
7.2+500%