
GeForce Go 7600 GT vs Radeon HD 6380G

GeForce Go 7600 GT
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6380G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 7600 GT is positioned at rank 331 and the Radeon HD 6380G is on rank 257, so the Radeon HD 6380G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7600 GT
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6380G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 7600 GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6380G offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce Go 7600 GT | Radeon HD 6380G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7600 GT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 7600 GT and Radeon HD 6380G

GeForce Go 7600 GT
The GeForce Go 7600 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon HD 6380G
The Radeon HD 6380G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 201 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce Go 7600 GT scores 210 and the Radeon HD 6380G reaches 201 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7600 GT is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6380G uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce Go 7600 GT) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6380G). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7600 GT) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6380G).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7600 GT | Radeon HD 6380G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 210+4% | 201 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152 | 1280+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.378 TFLOPS+24% | 1.92 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 320 KB+233% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 7600 GT | Radeon HD 6380G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 7600 GT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6380G has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 6380G offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7600 GT | Radeon HD 6380G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7600 GT) vs 11 (Radeon HD 6380G). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7600 GT | Radeon HD 6380G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 11+22% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo (GeForce Go 7600 GT) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6380G). Decoder: PureVideo vs UVD 3.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7600 GT | Radeon HD 6380G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7600 GT draws 170W versus the Radeon HD 6380G's 186W — a 9% difference. The GeForce Go 7600 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7600 GT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6380G). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7600 GT | Radeon HD 6380G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-9% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce Go 7600 GT is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7600 GT | Radeon HD 6380G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $10 |
| Codename | GK104 | Cayman |
| Release | June 25 2013 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #450 | #598 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















