GeForce Go 7600 GT vs Radeon HD 6320M

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7600 GT

2013Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6320M

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce Go 7600 GT vs Radeon HD 6320M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7600 GT vs Radeon HD 6320M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 7600 GT vs Radeon HD 6320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7600 GT

2013

Why buy it

  • 25.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6320M

2011

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce Go 7600 GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce Go 7600 GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 25.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 6.1% in PassMark G3D (210 vs 198), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce Go 7600 GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce Go 7600 GT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce Go 7600 GT vs Radeon HD 6320M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7600 GT

The GeForce Go 7600 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Radeon HD 6320M

The Radeon HD 6320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 198 points. Launch price was $180.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7600 GT scores 210 versus the Radeon HD 6320M's 198 — the GeForce Go 7600 GT leads by 6.1%. The GeForce Go 7600 GT is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6320M uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce Go 7600 GT) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6320M). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7600 GT) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6320M).

FeatureGeForce Go 7600 GTRadeon HD 6320M
G3D Mark Score
210+6%
198
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1152
1280+11%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.378 TFLOPS+24%
1.92 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
96+20%
80
L1 Cache
96 KB
320 KB+233%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 7600 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6320M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce Go 7600 GTRadeon HD 6320M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 7600 GT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6320M carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6320M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7600 GT and System on the Radeon HD 6320M.

FeatureGeForce Go 7600 GTRadeon HD 6320M
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7600 GT) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6320M). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce Go 7600 GTRadeon HD 6320M
DirectX
9.0c
11.2+24%
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
2.1
4.4+110%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo (GeForce Go 7600 GT) vs None (Radeon HD 6320M). Decoder: PureVideo vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2 (GeForce Go 7600 GT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 6320M).

FeatureGeForce Go 7600 GTRadeon HD 6320M
Encoder
PureVideo
None
Decoder
PureVideo
UVD 3
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7600 GT draws 170W versus the Radeon HD 6320M's 186W — a 9% difference. The GeForce Go 7600 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7600 GT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6320M). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 95.

FeatureGeForce Go 7600 GTRadeon HD 6320M
TDP
170W-9%
186W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C-16%
95
Perf/Watt
1.2+9%
1.1