GeForce Go 7950 GTX vs GeForce 410M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 7950 GTX is positioned at rank 247 and the GeForce 410M is on rank 56, so the GeForce 410M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7950 GTX

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

1649%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1584%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

1565%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1563%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1560%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

1551%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

1531%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1525%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1511%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

1507%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

1489%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1486%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

1459%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1458%

#231

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

1818%

#246

GeForce G100

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

100%

#247

GeForce Go 7950 GTX

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#248

Radeon R7 M265

MSRP: $130|Avg: $30

98%

#249

Radeon HD 8250

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

96%

#250

Radeon HD 3300

MSRP: $30|Avg: $5

96%

#251

Radeon R5 220

MSRP: $35|Avg: $15

95%

#253

Radeon HD 7350

MSRP: $40|Avg: $10

94%

#254

GeForce GTX 285

MSRP: $359|Avg: $30

93%

#255

Radeon HD 7570

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

92%

#256

Radeon HD 6380G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

91%

#257

Radeon HD 4550

MSRP: $59|Avg: $15

91%

#258

RADEON HD7450

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

90%

#259

GeForce GT 330

MSRP: $99|Avg: $30

90%

#261

Radeon HD 7340G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 410M

#19

Radeon RX 5600

MSRP: $229|Avg: $150

95%

#46

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

200%

#48

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

182%

#49

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

181%

#53

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

165%

#54

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

164%

#56

GeForce 410M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#58

GeForce 770M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

100%

#62

Radeon 820M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

99%

#65

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

97%

#66

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

97%

#68

GeForce GTX 850M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 410M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7950 GTX.

Insight	GeForce Go 7950 GTX	GeForce 410M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 410M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce Go 7950 GTX Benchmark Check

GeForce 410M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 7950 GTX and GeForce 410M

GeForce Go 7950 GTX

The GeForce Go 7950 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 264 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce 410M

The GeForce 410M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 271 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 7950 GTX scores 264 and the GeForce 410M reaches 271 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7950 GTX is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 410M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs 384 (GeForce 410M). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 410M). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1176 MHz.

Feature	GeForce Go 7950 GTX	GeForce 410M
G3D Mark Score	264	271+3%
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.389 TFLOPS+54%	0.9032 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1085 MHz	1176 MHz+8%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	40+67%	24
L1 Cache	320 KB+67%	192 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce Go 7950 GTX	GeForce 410M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs 1 MB (GeForce 410M) — the GeForce Go 7950 GTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce Go 7950 GTX	GeForce 410M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs 11.0 (GeForce 410M). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce Go 7950 GTX	GeForce 410M
DirectX	9.0c	11.0+22%
OpenGL	2.1	4.6+119%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs None (GeForce 410M). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 410M).

Feature	GeForce Go 7950 GTX	GeForce 410M
Encoder	No	None
Decoder	PureVideo	PureVideo VP4
Codecs	MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7950 GTX draws 75W versus the GeForce 410M's 33W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 410M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs 350W (GeForce 410M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.