GeForce Go 7950 GTX vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce Go 7950 GTX
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce Go 7950 GTX is positioned at rank #247 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7950 GTX
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 7950 GTX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 11861.4% higher G3D Mark score and 2300% more VRAM (12 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7950 GTX.
| Insight | GeForce Go 7950 GTX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-11861.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+11861.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 7950 GTX and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce Go 7950 GTX
The GeForce Go 7950 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 264 points. Launch price was $149.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7950 GTX scores 264 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 11861.4%. The GeForce Go 7950 GTX is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7950 GTX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 264 | 31,578+11861% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 7680+1100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.389 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+2786% |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 2610 MHz+141% |
| ROPs | 16 | 80+400% |
| TMUs | 40 | 240+500% |
| L1 Cache | 0.31 MB | 7.5 MB+2319% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce Go 7950 GTX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7950 GTX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 7950 GTX comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7950 GTX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 12 GB+2300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7950 GTX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 12 Ultimate+33% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6+119% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7950 GTX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7950 GTX draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 116.7% difference. The GeForce Go 7950 GTX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 285mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7950 GTX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-74% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 285mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.5 | 110.8+3066% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7950 GTX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $590 |
| Codename | GM107 | AD104 |
| Release | February 18 2014 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #501 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce Go 7950 GTX and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
