
GeForce GT 1030

GeForce MX250
GeForce GT 1030 vs GeForce MX250 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 1030 vs GeForce MX250 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 1030 vs GeForce MX250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 1030
2017Why buy it
- ✅13.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 92.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.5 vs 15.8 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 30W vs 10W.
GeForce MX250
2019Why buy it
- ✅GeForce GT 1030 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX250 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 30W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 1030 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2019 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌89.9% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 30.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 1030 vs GeForce MX250 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 1030
The GeForce GT 1030 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,407 points. Launch price was $79.

GeForce MX250
The GeForce MX250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,375 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 1030 scores 2,407 and the GeForce MX250 reaches 2,375 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 1030 is built on Pascal while the GeForce MX250 uses Pascal, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 1030) vs 384 (GeForce MX250). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 1030) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX250). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,407+1% | 2,375 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS+41% | 0.7972 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz+41% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 1030 and 64-bit on the GeForce MX250.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 48 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GT 1030) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX250). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 1030) vs None (GeForce MX250). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GT 1030) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce MX250).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 1030 draws 30W versus the GeForce MX250's 10W — a 100% difference. The GeForce MX250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 1030) vs 350W (GeForce MX250). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 10W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 145mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 80.2 | 237.5+196% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 1030 came in at $79, while the GeForce MX250 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce GT 1030 was 47.3% cheaper ($71 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.5 (GeForce GT 1030) vs 15.8 (GeForce MX250) — the GeForce GT 1030 offers 93% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX250 (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79-47% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.5+93% | 15.8 |
| Codename | GP108 | GP108B |
| Release | May 17 2017 | February 20 2019 |
| Ranking | #641 | #643 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















