
GeForce GT 1030
Popular choices:

GRID M10-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 1030 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-1Q.
| Insight | GeForce GT 1030 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 1030 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 1030 holds the technical lead. Priced at $95 (vs $500), it costs 81% less, resulting in a 431.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 1030 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+431.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($95) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 1030 and GRID M10-1Q

GeForce GT 1030
The GeForce GT 1030 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,407 points. Launch price was $79.

GRID M10-1Q
The GRID M10-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,385 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 1030 scores 2,407 and the GRID M10-1Q reaches 2,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 1030 is built on Pascal while the GRID M10-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 1030) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-1Q). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 1030) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1Q). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,407 | 2,385 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+328% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz+25% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 768 KB+433% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 1030) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-1Q) — the GRID M10-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GT 1030) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-1Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 1030 draws 30W versus the GRID M10-1Q's 225W — a 152.9% difference. The GeForce GT 1030 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 1030) vs 350W (GRID M10-1Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-87% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 267mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 80.2+657% | 10.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 1030 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $95, while the GRID M10-1Q launched at $0 and now averages $500. The GeForce GT 1030 costs 81% less ($405 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.3 (GeForce GT 1030) vs 4.8 (GRID M10-1Q) — the GeForce GT 1030 offers 427.1% better value. The GeForce GT 1030 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $95-81% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.3+427% | 4.8 |
| Codename | GP108 | GM204 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #641 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















