
GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon RX 550X

GeForce GT 1030
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 550X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 550X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 550X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 1030 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 1030 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 550X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 550X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $45 versus $95 for the GeForce GT 1030, it costs 53% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 108.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+108.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($95) | ✅More affordable ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 1030 and Radeon RX 550X

GeForce GT 1030
The GeForce GT 1030 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,407 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon RX 550X
The Radeon RX 550X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,381 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 1030 scores 2,407 and the Radeon RX 550X reaches 2,381 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 1030 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 550X uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 1030) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550X). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 1030) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550X). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,407+1% | 2,381 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+7% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz+24% | 1183 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB+13% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 1030 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550X has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 550X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GT 1030) vs 12 (Radeon RX 550X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 1030) vs UVD (Radeon RX 550X). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GT 1030) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 550X).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | VCE |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 1030 draws 30W versus the Radeon RX 550X's 50W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GT 1030 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 1030) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550X). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 145mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 300W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 145mm | 145mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 80.2+68% | 47.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 1030 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $95, while the Radeon RX 550X launched at $109 and now averages $45. The Radeon RX 550X costs 52.6% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.3 (GeForce GT 1030) vs 52.9 (Radeon RX 550X) — the Radeon RX 550X offers 109.1% better value. The Radeon RX 550X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79-28% | $109 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $95 | $45-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.3 | 52.9+109% |
| Codename | GP108 | Lexa |
| Release | May 17 2017 | December 16 2018 |
| Ranking | #641 | #642 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















