
GeForce GT 1030

Radeon RX 550X
GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon RX 550X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon RX 550X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon RX 550X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 1030
2017Why buy it
- ✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 39.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.5 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon RX 550X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅GeForce GT 1030 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550X is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 1030 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌38% HIGHER MSRP$109 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 30.5 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon RX 550X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 1030
The GeForce GT 1030 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,407 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon RX 550X
The Radeon RX 550X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,381 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 1030 scores 2,407 and the Radeon RX 550X reaches 2,381 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 1030 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 550X uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 1030) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550X). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 1030) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550X). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,407+1% | 2,381 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+7% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz+24% | 1183 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB+13% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550X is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GT 1030 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GT 1030 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 550X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 1030 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550X carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 550X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 1030 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 550X.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GT 1030) vs 12 (Radeon RX 550X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 1030) vs UVD (Radeon RX 550X). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GT 1030) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 550X).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | VCE |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 1030 draws 30W versus the Radeon RX 550X's 50W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GT 1030 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 1030) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550X). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 145mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 300W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 145mm | 145mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 80.2+68% | 47.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 1030 came in at $79, while the Radeon RX 550X launched at $109. On MSRP, GeForce GT 1030 was 27.5% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.5 (GeForce GT 1030) vs 21.8 (Radeon RX 550X) — the GeForce GT 1030 offers 39.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 550X (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79-28% | $109 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.5+40% | 21.8 |
| Codename | GP108 | Lexa |
| Release | May 17 2017 | December 16 2018 |
| Ranking | #641 | #642 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















