
GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon Pro

GeForce GT 1030
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 1030 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 1030 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro.
| Insight | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 1030 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $95 versus $99 for the Radeon Pro, it costs 4% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($95) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($99) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 1030 and Radeon Pro

GeForce GT 1030
The GeForce GT 1030 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,407 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon Pro
The Radeon Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,366 points. Launch price was $1,899.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 1030 scores 2,407 and the Radeon Pro reaches 2,366 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 1030 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro uses GCN 5.1, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 1030) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 1030) vs 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1700 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,407+2% | 2,366 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 3840+900% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS | 13.06 TFLOPS+1059% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1700 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 240+900% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 960 KB+567% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 1030) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro) — the Radeon Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GT 1030) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 1030) vs Unified Video Decoder (Radeon Pro). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs Unified Video Decoder.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Unified Video Decoder |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | Unified Video Decoder |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 1030 draws 30W versus the Radeon Pro's 250W — a 157.1% difference. The GeForce GT 1030 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 1030) vs 350W (Radeon Pro). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-88% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 241mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 80.2+744% | 9.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 1030 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $95, while the Radeon Pro launched at $0 and now averages $99. The GeForce GT 1030 costs 4% less ($4 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.3 (GeForce GT 1030) vs 23.9 (Radeon Pro) — the GeForce GT 1030 offers 5.9% better value. The Radeon Pro is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GT 1030 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $95-4% | $99 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.3+6% | 23.9 |
| Codename | GP108 | Vega 20 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | May 13 2020 |
| Ranking | #641 | #194 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















