GeForce GT 220M vs Quadro 400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 220M vs Quadro 400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 220M vs Quadro 400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 220M

2013

Why buy it

✅15.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Quadro 400

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 220M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 220M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 8.8% in PassMark G3D (161 vs 148), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 220M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro 400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro 400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 220M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 220M vs Quadro 400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 220M

The GeForce GT 220M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 161 points.

Quadro 400

The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 220M scores 161 versus the Quadro 400's 148 — the GeForce GT 220M leads by 8.8%. The GeForce GT 220M is built on Kepler while the Quadro 400 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 220M) vs 256 (Quadro 400). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 220M) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro 400). Boost clocks: 967 MHz vs 1252 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Quadro 400
G3D Mark Score	161+9%	148
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384+50%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7427 TFLOPS+16%	0.641 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	967 MHz	1252 MHz+29%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32+100%	16
L1 Cache	32 KB	96 KB+200%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 220M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Quadro 400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 220M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 400 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 220M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 220M and 64-bit on the Quadro 400. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 220M) vs 512 KB (Quadro 400) — the Quadro 400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Quadro 400
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 220M) vs 10_1 (Quadro 400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Quadro 400
DirectX	10.0	10_1
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 220M draws 50W versus the Quadro 400's 30W — a 50% difference. The Quadro 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 220M) vs 350W (Quadro 400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Quadro 400
TDP	50W	30W-40%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	168mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.2	4.9+53%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro 400 (2017 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Quadro 400
MSRP	—	$169
Codename	GK107	GP107
Release	January 9 2013	February 7 2017
Ranking	#792	#741

Search GeForce GT 220M on Amazon

Search Quadro 400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.