GeForce GT 220M vs Quadro 400
GeForce GT 220M
Popular choices:
Quadro 400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 220M is positioned at rank 358 and the Quadro 400 is on rank 360, so the GeForce GT 220M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 220M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 220M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 400.
| Insight | GeForce GT 220M | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 220M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 220M and Quadro 400
GeForce GT 220M
The GeForce GT 220M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 161 points.
Quadro 400
The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 220M scores 161 versus the Quadro 400's 148 — the GeForce GT 220M leads by 8.8%. The GeForce GT 220M is built on Kepler while the Quadro 400 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 220M) vs 256 (Quadro 400). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 220M) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro 400). Boost clocks: 967 MHz vs 1252 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220M | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 161+9% | 148 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+50% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7427 TFLOPS+16% | 0.641 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 1252 MHz+29% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32+100% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 96 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 220M | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 220M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 400 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 220M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 220M) vs 512 KB (Quadro 400) — the Quadro 400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220M | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 220M) vs 10_1 (Quadro 400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220M | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10_1 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 220M draws 50W versus the Quadro 400's 30W — a 50% difference. The Quadro 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 220M) vs 350W (Quadro 400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 220M | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 30W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 4.9+53% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 400 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 220M | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $169 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $500 |
| Codename | GK107 | GP107 |
| Release | January 9 2013 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #792 | #741 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 220M and Quadro 400
