GeForce GT 220M vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 220M

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

2011Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 220M vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 220M vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 220M vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 220M

2013

Why buy it

  • 22.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 220M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 220M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 7.3% in PassMark G3D (161 vs 150), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 220M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3650 AGP makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 3650 AGP is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 220M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 220M vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 220M

The GeForce GT 220M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 161 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 150 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 220M scores 161 versus the Radeon HD 3650 AGP's 150 — the GeForce GT 220M leads by 7.3%. The GeForce GT 220M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 3650 AGP uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 220M) vs 480 (Radeon HD 3650 AGP). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 220M) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3650 AGP).

FeatureGeForce GT 220MRadeon HD 3650 AGP
G3D Mark Score
161+7%
150
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7427 TFLOPS+29%
0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
32 KB
48 KB+50%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 220M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3650 AGP leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 220MRadeon HD 3650 AGP
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 220M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3650 AGP carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 220M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 220M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3650 AGP.

FeatureGeForce GT 220MRadeon HD 3650 AGP
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 220M draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 3650 AGP's 45W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 220M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3650 AGP). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GT 220MRadeon HD 3650 AGP
TDP
50W
45W-10%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
3.2
3.3+3%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 220M (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GT 220MRadeon HD 3650 AGP
MSRP
$80
Codename
GK107
Onega
Release
January 9 2013
April 19 2011
Ranking
#792
#926

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.