GeForce GT 220M vs Radeon HD 4350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 220M vs Radeon HD 4350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 220M vs Radeon HD 4350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 220M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 110W, a 60W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4350 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4350

2008

Why buy it

✅9.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌120% higher power demand at 110W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 4350 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (165 vs 161), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 220M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4350 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 220M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 220M vs Radeon HD 4350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 220M

The GeForce GT 220M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 161 points.

Radeon HD 4350

The Radeon HD 4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 165 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 220M scores 161 and the Radeon HD 4350 reaches 165 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 220M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 4350 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 220M) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4350). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 220M) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4350).

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Radeon HD 4350
G3D Mark Score	161	165+2%
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384	800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7427 TFLOPS	1 TFLOPS+35%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	32 KB	160 KB+400%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 220M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4350 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Radeon HD 4350
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 220M and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4350.

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Radeon HD 4350
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 220M) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4350). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Radeon HD 4350
DirectX	10.0	10.1
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	1	3+200%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 220M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 4350).

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Radeon HD 4350
Encoder	No	—
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP3	UVD 2.2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 220M draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 4350's 110W — a 75% difference. The GeForce GT 220M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 220M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 72°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Radeon HD 4350
TDP	50W-55%	110W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	70°C-3%	72°C
Perf/Watt	3.2+113%	1.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 220M (2013 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Radeon HD 4350
MSRP	—	$35
Codename	GK107	RV770
Release	January 9 2013	June 25 2008
Ranking	#792	#876

Search GeForce GT 220M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.