GeForce GT 220M vs Quadro FX 3450

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 220M vs Quadro FX 3450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 220M vs Quadro FX 3450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 220M

2013

Why buy it

✅10.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $119 MSRP).

Quadro FX 3450

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 220M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 220M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 8.1% in PassMark G3D (161 vs 149), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 220M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 3450 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 3450 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 220M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 220M vs Quadro FX 3450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 220M

The GeForce GT 220M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 161 points.

Quadro FX 3450

The Quadro FX 3450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 149 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 220M scores 161 versus the Quadro FX 3450's 149 — the GeForce GT 220M leads by 8.1%. The GeForce GT 220M is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 3450 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 220M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3450). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 220M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3450).

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Quadro FX 3450
G3D Mark Score	161+8%	149
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7427 TFLOPS+19%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 220M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 3450 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Quadro FX 3450
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 220M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3450 carries 256 MB. GeForce GT 220M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 220M and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3450.

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Quadro FX 3450
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+300%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 220M draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 3450's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The GeForce GT 220M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 220M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Quadro FX 3450
TDP	50W-74%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.2+300%	0.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 220M (2013 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GT 220M	Quadro FX 3450
MSRP	—	$119
Codename	GK107	GT200B
Release	January 9 2013	November 11 2008
Ranking	#792	#815

Search GeForce GT 220M on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 3450 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.