GeForce GT 230M
VS
Radeon E6465

GeForce GT 230M vs Radeon E6465

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 230M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon E6465

2011Core: 600 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 230M is positioned at rank #95 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 230M

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
504%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
484%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
478%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
478%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
477%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
474%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
468%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
466%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
462%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
461%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
455%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
454%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
446%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
446%
#79
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
556%
#80
GeForce RTX 5090
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700
100%
#81
Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP: $260|Avg: $170
96%
#82
Intel UHD Graphics P750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
86%
#83
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $100
85%
#95
GeForce GT 230M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#96
Radeon R7 A8-7690K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
99%
#97
GeForce GT 1010
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
96%
#98
Radeon R7 430
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
96%
#100
Radeon 550X
MSRP: $109|Avg: $45
94%
#101
GeForce GT 720
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
93%
#102
Radeon R7 240
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
91%
#103
Radeon R7 G
MSRP: $69|Avg: $51
88%
#106
Radeon R7 250
MSRP: $89|Avg: $25
82%
#107
GeForce GT 640
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
82%
#108
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GT 230M is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The GeForce GT 230M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon E6465 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon E6465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 230M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GT 230MRadeon E6465
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-6.9%)
Leading raw performance (+6.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon E6465 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 230M and Radeon E6465

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 230M

The GeForce GT 230M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon E6465

The Radeon E6465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 231 points. Launch price was $239.99.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 230M scores 216 versus the Radeon E6465's 231 — the Radeon E6465 leads by 6.9%. The GeForce GT 230M is built on Pascal while the Radeon E6465 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 230M) vs 480 (Radeon E6465).

FeatureGeForce GT 230MRadeon E6465
G3D Mark Score
216
231+7%
Architecture
Pascal
TeraScale 2
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
480+25%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
24
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 230MRadeon E6465
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 230M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E6465 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 230M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 230MRadeon E6465
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 230M) vs 11_0 (Radeon E6465). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GT 230MRadeon E6465
DirectX
10.1
11_0+9%
Max Displays
1
4+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 230M) vs UVD 3 (Radeon E6465). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 230MRadeon E6465
Encoder
No
UVD 3
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD 3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 230M draws 30W versus the Radeon E6465's 45W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GT 230M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 230M) vs 350W (Radeon E6465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GT 230MRadeon E6465
TDP
30W-33%
45W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
7.2+41%
5.1
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 230M is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GT 230MRadeon E6465
MSRP
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$49
Codename
GP108
Turks
Release
May 17 2017
May 2 2011
Ranking
#641
#923