GeForce GT 230M vs Radeon E6465

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 230M vs Radeon E6465 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 230M vs Radeon E6465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 230M

2017

Why buy it

✅1.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 45W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon E6465

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 230M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 45W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 230M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon E6465 instead at 231 vs 216, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 230M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 230M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GT 230M vs Radeon E6465 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 230M

The GeForce GT 230M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon E6465

The Radeon E6465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 231 points. Launch price was $239.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 230M scores 216 versus the Radeon E6465's 231 — the Radeon E6465 leads by 6.9%. The GeForce GT 230M is built on Pascal while the Radeon E6465 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 230M) vs 480 (Radeon E6465).

Feature	GeForce GT 230M	Radeon E6465
G3D Mark Score	216	231+7%
Architecture	Pascal	TeraScale 2
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	480+25%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	24	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 230M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon E6465 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 230M	Radeon E6465
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 230M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E6465 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 230M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 230M and 64-bit on the Radeon E6465.

Feature	GeForce GT 230M	Radeon E6465
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 230M) vs 11_0 (Radeon E6465). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GT 230M	Radeon E6465
DirectX	10.1	11_0+9%
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 230M) vs UVD 3 (Radeon E6465). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3.

Feature	GeForce GT 230M	Radeon E6465
Encoder	No	UVD 3
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	UVD 3
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 230M draws 30W versus the Radeon E6465's 45W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GT 230M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 230M) vs 350W (Radeon E6465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce GT 230M	Radeon E6465
TDP	30W-33%	45W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	168mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	7.2+41%	5.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 230M (2017 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GT 230M	Radeon E6465
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GP108	Turks
Release	May 17 2017	May 2 2011
Ranking	#641	#923

Search GeForce GT 230M on Amazon

Search Radeon E6465 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.