
GeForce GT 230M

Radeon HD 7450
GeForce GT 230M vs Radeon HD 7450 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 230M vs Radeon HD 7450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 230M vs Radeon HD 7450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 230M
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7450 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $45 MSRP).
Radeon HD 7450
2012Why buy it
- ✅8.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 230M vs Radeon HD 7450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 230M
The GeForce GT 230M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon HD 7450
The Radeon HD 7450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 224 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 230M scores 216 and the Radeon HD 7450 reaches 224 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 230M is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 7450 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 230M) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7450). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 230M) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7450). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 230M | Radeon HD 7450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 216 | 224+4% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1792+367% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS | 2.867 TFLOPS+154% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz+17% | 1250 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 112+367% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 448 KB+211% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 230M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7450 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 230M | Radeon HD 7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 230M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7450. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 230M) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7450) — the Radeon HD 7450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 230M | Radeon HD 7450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 230M) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 7450). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 230M | Radeon HD 7450 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.2+11% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 230M) vs UVD 3.1 (Radeon HD 7450). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 230M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon HD 7450).
| Feature | GeForce GT 230M | Radeon HD 7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 3.1 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 230M draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 7450's 200W — a 147.8% difference. The GeForce GT 230M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 230M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 230M | Radeon HD 7450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-85% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 7.2+555% | 1.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GT 230M (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 230M | Radeon HD 7450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $45 |
| Codename | GP108 | Tahiti |
| Release | May 17 2017 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #641 | #454 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














