GeForce GT 330M
VS
GeForce GT 240M

GeForce GT 330M vs GeForce GT 240M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 330M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 240M

2012Core: Up to 625 MHzBoost: 645 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 330M is positioned at rank 114 and the GeForce GT 240M is on rank 392, so the GeForce GT 330M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 330M

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
656%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
631%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
623%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
622%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
621%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
617%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
610%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
607%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
602%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
600%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
593%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
592%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
581%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
581%
#84
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
89%
#99
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
724%
#114
GeForce GT 330M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#115
GeForce 605
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
100%
#116
Radeon HD 8410G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
98%
#117
RADEON HD6530D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
96%
#118
Moore Threads MTT S30
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
95%
#119
Radeon 535
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
95%
#122
GeForce GTS 450
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
94%
#123
Radeon HD 8570D
MSRP: $40|Avg: $15
93%
#125
Radeon HD 8650G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
91%
#126
GeForce GT 630
MSRP: $69|Avg: $20
90%
#127
Radeon HD 6770
MSRP: $129|Avg: $129
89%
#129
GeForce GT 440
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 240M

#382
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1280%
#384
1161%
#385
1158%
#389
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1053%
#390
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1045%
#392
GeForce GT 240M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
100%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
99%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
98%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#400
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
95%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
95%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
#403
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
92%
#404
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
92%
#406
92%
#407
Radeon HD 8650G + 7700M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 330M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 240M.

InsightGeForce GT 330MGeForce GT 240M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+4.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 330M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 330M and GeForce GT 240M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 330M

The GeForce GT 330M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 221 points. Launch price was $79.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 240M

The GeForce GT 240M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 625 MHz to 645 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 212 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 330M scores 221 and the GeForce GT 240M reaches 212 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 330M is built on Pascal while the GeForce GT 240M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 330M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 240M). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 330M) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 240M). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 645 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 330MGeForce GT 240M
G3D Mark Score
221+4%
212
Architecture
Pascal
Kepler
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS+135%
0.48 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1468 MHz+128%
645 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
144 KB+350%
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 330MGeForce GT 240M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 330M) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 240M) — the GeForce GT 330M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 330MGeForce GT 240M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (10_1) (GeForce GT 330M) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 240M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GT 330MGeForce GT 240M
DirectX
11 (10_1)
11.1 (10_1)
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 330M) vs None (GeForce GT 240M). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD (VP4). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 330M) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 240M).

FeatureGeForce GT 330MGeForce GT 240M
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
PureVideo HD (VP4)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 330M draws 30W versus the GeForce GT 240M's 32W — a 6.5% difference. The GeForce GT 330M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 330M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 240M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70.

FeatureGeForce GT 330MGeForce GT 240M
TDP
30W-6%
32W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
70-18%
Perf/Watt
7.4+12%
6.6