CPU
GPU
GeForce GT 420
Popular choices:
FirePro M2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 420 is positioned at rank 214 and the FirePro M2000 is on rank 323, so the GeForce GT 420 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 420
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M2000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 420 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M2000.
| Insight | GeForce GT 420 | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $79), it costs 37% less, resulting in a 55.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 420 | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+55.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($79) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 420 and FirePro M2000
GeForce GT 420
The GeForce GT 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 432 points. Launch price was $89.
FirePro M2000
The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 420 scores 432 and the FirePro M2000 reaches 426 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 420 is built on Kepler while the FirePro M2000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 420) vs 640 (FirePro M2000). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 420) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000).
| Feature | GeForce GT 420 | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 432+1% | 426 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS | 1.024 TFLOPS+34% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 420 | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 420 | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 420) vs 11.1 (FirePro M2000). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GT 420 | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+8% | 11.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+10% | 4.2 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 6+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 420) vs UVD 3 (FirePro M2000). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 420) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M2000).
| Feature | GeForce GT 420 | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | VP4 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 420 draws 64W versus the FirePro M2000's 43W — a 39.3% difference. The FirePro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 420) vs 350W (FirePro M2000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 420 | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W | 43W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 6.8 | 9.9+46% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 420 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $79, while the FirePro M2000 launched at $300 and now averages $50. The FirePro M2000 costs 36.7% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.5 (GeForce GT 420) vs 8.5 (FirePro M2000) — the FirePro M2000 offers 54.5% better value. The GeForce GT 420 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 420 | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79-74% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $79 | $50-37% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5 | 8.5+55% |
| Codename | GK107 | Heathrow |
| Release | May 29 2014 | July 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #777 | #710 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 420 and FirePro M2000
