GeForce GT 430
VS
GeForce GTX 260M SLI

GeForce GT 430 vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 430

2014Core: 993 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 260M SLI

2009Core: 550 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 430 is positioned at rank 161 and the GeForce GTX 260M SLI is on rank 343, so the GeForce GT 430 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 430

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
951%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
913%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
903%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
901%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
899%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
894%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
883%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
880%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
872%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
869%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
859%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
857%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
841%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
841%
#90
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $4086.44
98%
#91
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
97%
#92
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
94%
#146
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1048%
#161
GeForce GT 430
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
100%
#164
98%
#165
Radeon HD 6520G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
98%
#166
Radeon HD 8470D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#167
GeForce GT 545
MSRP: $149|Avg: $20
98%
#170
GeForce GT 340
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#171
GeForce GT 230
MSRP: $44|Avg: $44
96%
#172
Radeon HD 6670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
96%
#175
Radeon R5 420
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
94%
#176
Radeon R7 A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $50
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 260M SLI

#333
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
923%
#335
837%
#336
835%
#340
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
759%
#341
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
754%
#343
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
100%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
96%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
95%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
94%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
94%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
93%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 430 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 260M SLI.

InsightGeForce GT 430GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 430 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 430 and GeForce GTX 260M SLI

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 430

The GeForce GT 430 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 603 points. Launch price was $89.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 260M SLI

The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 588 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 430 scores 603 and the GeForce GTX 260M SLI reaches 588 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 430 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 260M SLI uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 430) vs 224 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI).

FeatureGeForce GT 430GeForce GTX 260M SLI
G3D Mark Score
603+3%
588
Architecture
Kepler
G9x
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+71%
224

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 430GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 430 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 430 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 430GeForce GTX 260M SLI
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 430) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 260M SLI). OpenGL: 4.0 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 430GeForce GTX 260M SLI
DirectX
11.0
11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL
4.0+21%
3.3
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 430) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 430) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI).

FeatureGeForce GT 430GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Encoder
No
PureVideo HD VP2
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 430 draws 64W versus the GeForce GTX 260M SLI's 150W — a 80.4% difference. The GeForce GT 430 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 430) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 260M SLI). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 90°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 430GeForce GTX 260M SLI
TDP
64W-57%
150W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-22%
90°C
Perf/Watt
9.4+141%
3.9
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 430 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GT 430GeForce GTX 260M SLI
MSRP
$79
Avg Price (30d)
$40
Codename
GK107
NB9E-GTX
Release
May 29 2014
March 2 2009
Ranking
#777
#806