
GeForce GT 430

Radeon R6 M255DX
GeForce GT 430 vs Radeon R6 M255DX Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 430 vs Radeon R6 M255DX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 430 vs Radeon R6 M255DX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 430
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R6 M255DX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 64W vs 30W.
- ❌14400% longer card at 145mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R6 M255DX
2014Why buy it
- ✅80.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 64W, a 34W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 145mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 430 vs Radeon R6 M255DX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 430
The GeForce GT 430 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 603 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon R6 M255DX
The Radeon R6 M255DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2014. It features the GCN architecture. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 605 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 430 scores 603 and the Radeon R6 M255DX reaches 605 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 430 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R6 M255DX uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 430) vs 896 (Radeon R6 M255DX).
| Feature | GeForce GT 430 | Radeon R6 M255DX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 603 | 605 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 896+133% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 430 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R6 M255DX leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 430 | Radeon R6 M255DX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 430 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R6 M255DX carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 430 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 430 and 64-bit on the Radeon R6 M255DX.
| Feature | GeForce GT 430 | Radeon R6 M255DX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 430) vs 12_0 (Radeon R6 M255DX). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 430 | Radeon R6 M255DX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12_0+9% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 430) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R6 M255DX). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 430 | Radeon R6 M255DX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 430 draws 64W versus the Radeon R6 M255DX's 30W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon R6 M255DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 430) vs 350W (Radeon R6 M255DX). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 430 | Radeon R6 M255DX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W | 30W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.4 | 20.2+115% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 430 came in at $79, while the Radeon R6 M255DX launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon R6 M255DX was 100+% cheaper ($79 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.6 (GeForce GT 430) vs Infinity (Radeon R6 M255DX) — the Radeon R6 M255DX offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GT 430 | Radeon R6 M255DX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK107 | — |
| Release | May 29 2014 | June 4 2014 |
| Ranking | #777 | #800 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














