GeForce GT 430 vs Radeon R7 A360

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 430 vs Radeon R7 A360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 430 vs Radeon R7 A360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 430

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅Delivers 35.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.6 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 64W instead of 80W, a 16W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A360 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 A360

2015

Why buy it

✅33.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
38% HIGHER MSRP
$109 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.7 vs 7.6 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 80W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 A360 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 33.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (616 vs 603), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 430 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 430 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $109, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 35.1% (7.6 vs 5.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 A360 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 430 vs Radeon R7 A360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 430

The GeForce GT 430 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 603 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon R7 A360

The Radeon R7 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 616 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 430 scores 603 and the Radeon R7 A360 reaches 616 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 430 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 A360 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 430) vs 768 (Radeon R7 A360). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 430) vs 1.613 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A360).

Feature	GeForce GT 430	Radeon R7 A360
G3D Mark Score	603	616+2%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	768+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS	1.613 TFLOPS+112%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	32 KB	192 KB+500%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 430 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 A360 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 430	Radeon R7 A360
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 430 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A360 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 430 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 430 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A360.

Feature	GeForce GT 430	Radeon R7 A360
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 430 draws 64W versus the Radeon R7 A360's 80W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GT 430 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 430) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A360). Power connectors: None vs None.

Feature	GeForce GT 430	Radeon R7 A360
TDP	64W-20%	80W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	145mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	9.4+22%	7.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 430 came in at $79, while the Radeon R7 A360 launched at $109. On MSRP, GeForce GT 430 was 27.5% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.6 (GeForce GT 430) vs 5.7 (Radeon R7 A360) — the GeForce GT 430 offers 33.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A360 (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GT 430	Radeon R7 A360
MSRP	$79-28%	$109
Performance per Dollar	7.6+33%	5.7
Codename	GK107	Tobago
Release	May 29 2014	June 18 2015
Ranking	#777	#576

Search GeForce GT 430 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A360 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.