GeForce GT 445M vs GeForce GT 635

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 445M

2013Core: 549 MHz
Similar parts
···
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 635

2010Core: 607 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 445M vs GeForce GT 635 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 445M vs GeForce GT 635 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 445M vs GeForce GT 635: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 445M

2013

Why buy it

  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 45W instead of 200W, a 155W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 635 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

GeForce GT 635

2010

Why buy it

  • 85.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 344.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 635 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 85.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 445M instead at 811 vs 810, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 445M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 635 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 635 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 445M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 445M vs GeForce GT 635 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 445M

The GeForce GT 445M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 811 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 635

The GeForce GT 635 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 810 points. Launch price was $279.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 445M scores 811 and the GeForce GT 635 reaches 810 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 445M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 635 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 445M) vs 352 (GeForce GT 635). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 445M) vs 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 635).

FeatureGeForce GT 445MGeForce GT 635
G3D Mark Score
811
810
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384+9%
352
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4216 TFLOPS
0.8554 TFLOPS+103%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
44+38%
L1 Cache
32 KB
704 KB+2100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 445MGeForce GT 635
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 445M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 635 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 445M gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 445M and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 635. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 445M) vs 512 KB (GeForce GT 635) — the GeForce GT 635 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 445MGeForce GT 635
VRAM Capacity
1.5 GB+200%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 445M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 635). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 445MGeForce GT 635
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: CUDA (GeForce GT 445M) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 635). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 445M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 635).

FeatureGeForce GT 445MGeForce GT 635
Encoder
CUDA
NVENC (1st Gen)
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 445M draws 45W versus the GeForce GT 635's 200W — a 126.5% difference. The GeForce GT 445M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 445M) vs 200W (GeForce GT 635). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 445MGeForce GT 635
TDP
45W-78%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
200W-43%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
145mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
18.0+350%
4.0
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 445M (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GT 445MGeForce GT 635
MSRP
$99
Codename
GK107
GF100
Release
April 1 2013
May 31 2010
Ranking
#857
#618

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.