
GeForce GT 445M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

GeForce GT 445M
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 445M is positioned at rank 59 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is on rank 224, so the GeForce GT 445M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 445M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2013). The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 445M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 445M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700.
| Insight | GeForce GT 445M | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 445M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 445M and Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

GeForce GT 445M
The GeForce GT 445M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 811 points.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 445M scores 811 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 reaches 806 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 445M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 uses Bristol Ridge, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 445M) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 445M) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700).
| Feature | GeForce GT 445M | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 811 | 806 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Bristol Ridge |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 4096+967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4216 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+11247% |
| ROPs | 16 | 128+700% |
| TMUs | 32 | 256+700% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 445M | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 445M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 445M offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 445M) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 445M | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.5 GB+200% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 445M) vs 12 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 445M | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: CUDA (GeForce GT 445M) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD 6.0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 445M | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | CUDA | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 445M draws 45W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700's 300W — a 147.8% difference. The GeForce GT 445M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 445M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 445M | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-85% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.0+567% | 2.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 445M | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $169 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $100 |
| Codename | GK107 | Navi 48 |
| Release | April 1 2013 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #857 | #23 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















