GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce GT 520MX

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 520M

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 520MX

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce GT 520MX Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce GT 520MX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce GT 520MX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 520M

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 520MX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 33.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $60 MSRPvs$45 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.7 vs 6.5 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $45 MSRP).

GeForce GT 520MX

2013

Why buy it

  • 10.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $15 less on MSRP ($45 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • Delivers 36.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.5 vs 4.7 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 520MX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (291 vs 284), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 520M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 520MX makes the most sense to buy today. It is $15 cheaper on MSRP at $45 vs $60, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 36.6% (6.5 vs 4.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 520MX is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 520M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce GT 520MX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 520M

The GeForce GT 520M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 284 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 520MX

The GeForce GT 520MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 291 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 520M scores 284 and the GeForce GT 520MX reaches 291 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 520M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 520MX uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 520M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 520MX). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520M) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520MX). Boost clocks: 967 MHz vs 967 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MGeForce GT 520MX
G3D Mark Score
284
291+2%
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7427 TFLOPS
0.7427 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
967 MHz
967 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
32 KB
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 520MGeForce GT 520MX
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 520M and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 520MX.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MGeForce GT 520MX
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 520M) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 520MX). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MGeForce GT 520MX
DirectX
11.0
11.0
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
4.0
4.0
Max Displays
1
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 520M) vs No (GeForce GT 520MX). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 520M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 520MX).

FeatureGeForce GT 520MGeForce GT 520MX
Encoder
No
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 520M draws 50W versus the GeForce GT 520MX's 50W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GT 520MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 520M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 520MX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MGeForce GT 520MX
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
70°C
Perf/Watt
5.7
5.8+2%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 520M came in at $60, while the GeForce GT 520MX launched at $45. On MSRP, GeForce GT 520MX was 25% cheaper ($15 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.7 (GeForce GT 520M) vs 6.5 (GeForce GT 520MX) — the GeForce GT 520MX offers 38.3% better value.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MGeForce GT 520MX
MSRP
$60
$45-25%
Performance per Dollar
4.7
6.5+38%
Codename
GK107
GK107
Release
January 9 2013
January 9 2013
Ranking
#792
#792

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.