
GeForce GT 520M

GeForce GT 520MX
GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce GT 520MX Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce GT 520MX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce GT 520MX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 520M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 520MX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌33.3% HIGHER MSRP$60 MSRPvs$45 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.7 vs 6.5 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $45 MSRP).
GeForce GT 520MX
2013Why buy it
- ✅10.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($45 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 36.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.5 vs 4.7 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce GT 520MX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 520M
The GeForce GT 520M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 284 points.

GeForce GT 520MX
The GeForce GT 520MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 291 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 520M scores 284 and the GeForce GT 520MX reaches 291 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 520M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 520MX uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 520M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 520MX). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520M) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520MX). Boost clocks: 967 MHz vs 967 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520M | GeForce GT 520MX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 284 | 291+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7427 TFLOPS | 0.7427 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 967 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 520M | GeForce GT 520MX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 520M and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 520MX.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520M | GeForce GT 520MX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 520M) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 520MX). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520M | GeForce GT 520MX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 520M) vs No (GeForce GT 520MX). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 520M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 520MX).
| Feature | GeForce GT 520M | GeForce GT 520MX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 520M draws 50W versus the GeForce GT 520MX's 50W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GT 520MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 520M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 520MX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520M | GeForce GT 520MX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.7 | 5.8+2% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 520M came in at $60, while the GeForce GT 520MX launched at $45. On MSRP, GeForce GT 520MX was 25% cheaper ($15 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.7 (GeForce GT 520M) vs 6.5 (GeForce GT 520MX) — the GeForce GT 520MX offers 38.3% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520M | GeForce GT 520MX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | $45-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.7 | 6.5+38% |
| Codename | GK107 | GK107 |
| Release | January 9 2013 | January 9 2013 |
| Ranking | #792 | #792 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














