GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon R5 235X

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 520M

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 235X

2014Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon R5 235X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon R5 235X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon R5 235X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 520M

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 50W instead of 80W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 235X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 22.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $60 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.7 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Radeon R5 235X

2014

Why buy it

  • 15.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $11 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • Delivers 19.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 4.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 60% higher power demand at 80W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R5 235X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 520M instead at 284 vs 277, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 520M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 235X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $11 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $60, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 19.4% (5.7 vs 4.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 235X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 520M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon R5 235X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 520M

The GeForce GT 520M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 284 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 235X

The Radeon R5 235X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 277 points. Launch price was $99.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 520M scores 284 and the Radeon R5 235X reaches 277 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 520M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 235X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 520M) vs 640 (Radeon R5 235X). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520M) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 235X). Boost clocks: 967 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MRadeon R5 235X
G3D Mark Score
284+3%
277
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7427 TFLOPS
1.216 TFLOPS+64%
Boost Clock
967 MHz
1000 MHz+3%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
32 KB
160 KB+400%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 520M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 235X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MRadeon R5 235X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 520M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 235X.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MRadeon R5 235X
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 520M) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 235X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MRadeon R5 235X
DirectX
11.0
11.2+2%
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 520M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 235X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3.1.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MRadeon R5 235X
Encoder
No
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD 3.1
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 520M draws 50W versus the Radeon R5 235X's 80W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce GT 520M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 520M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 235X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GT 520MRadeon R5 235X
TDP
50W-38%
80W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
5.7+63%
3.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 520M came in at $60, while the Radeon R5 235X launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R5 235X was 18.3% cheaper ($11 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.7 (GeForce GT 520M) vs 5.7 (Radeon R5 235X) — the Radeon R5 235X offers 21.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 235X (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 520MRadeon R5 235X
MSRP
$60
$49-18%
Performance per Dollar
4.7
5.7+21%
Codename
GK107
Cape Verde
Release
January 9 2013
February 13 2014
Ranking
#792
#655

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.