
GeForce GT 520M

Radeon R5 235X
GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon R5 235X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon R5 235X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon R5 235X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 520M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 80W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 235X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌22.4% HIGHER MSRP$60 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.7 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
Radeon R5 235X
2014Why buy it
- ✅15.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 4.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 80W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon R5 235X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 520M
The GeForce GT 520M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 284 points.

Radeon R5 235X
The Radeon R5 235X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 277 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 520M scores 284 and the Radeon R5 235X reaches 277 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 520M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 235X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 520M) vs 640 (Radeon R5 235X). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520M) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 235X). Boost clocks: 967 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520M | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 284+3% | 277 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7427 TFLOPS | 1.216 TFLOPS+64% |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 1000 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 520M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 235X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520M | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 520M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 235X.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520M | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 520M) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 235X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520M | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 11.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 520M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 235X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520M | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 520M draws 50W versus the Radeon R5 235X's 80W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce GT 520M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 520M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 235X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 520M | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-38% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.7+63% | 3.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 520M came in at $60, while the Radeon R5 235X launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R5 235X was 18.3% cheaper ($11 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.7 (GeForce GT 520M) vs 5.7 (Radeon R5 235X) — the Radeon R5 235X offers 21.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 235X (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 520M | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | $49-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.7 | 5.7+21% |
| Codename | GK107 | Cape Verde |
| Release | January 9 2013 | February 13 2014 |
| Ranking | #792 | #655 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














