
GeForce GT 525M vs Radeon HD 7640G

GeForce GT 525M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7640G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 525M is positioned at rank 183 and the Radeon HD 7640G is on rank 380, so the GeForce GT 525M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 525M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7640G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7640G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 525M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 525M | Radeon HD 7640G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 525M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 525M holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 65.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 525M | Radeon HD 7640G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+65.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 525M and Radeon HD 7640G

GeForce GT 525M
The GeForce GT 525M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 451 points.

Radeon HD 7640G
The Radeon HD 7640G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 454 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 525M scores 451 and the Radeon HD 7640G reaches 454 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 525M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7640G uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 525M) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7640G). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 525M) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7640G).
| Feature | GeForce GT 525M | Radeon HD 7640G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 451 | 454 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 480+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7526 TFLOPS+31% | 0.576 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 48 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 525M | Radeon HD 7640G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 525M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7640G has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 525M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 525M | Radeon HD 7640G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL11_0) (GeForce GT 525M) vs 11 (11_0) (Radeon HD 7640G). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 525M | Radeon HD 7640G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL11_0)+9% | 11 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.4+5% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VP4 (GeForce GT 525M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7640G). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 525M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 7640G).
| Feature | GeForce GT 525M | Radeon HD 7640G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VP4 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | VP4 | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 525M draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 7640G's 45W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon HD 7640G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 525M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7640G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 525M | Radeon HD 7640G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 45W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 9.0 | 10.1+12% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 525M costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.0 (GeForce GT 525M) vs 9.1 (Radeon HD 7640G) — the GeForce GT 525M offers 64.8% better value. The GeForce GT 525M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 525M | Radeon HD 7640G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-40% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0+65% | 9.1 |
| Codename | GK107 | Turks |
| Release | June 25 2013 | January 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #726 | #870 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















