GeForce GT 530 vs GeForce GT 735M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 530 vs GeForce GT 735M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 530 vs GeForce GT 735M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 530

2015

Why buy it

✅75.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌80% higher power demand at 90W vs 50W.

GeForce GT 735M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 90W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 530 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 530 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 75.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (662 vs 655), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 530 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 530 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GT 530 vs GeForce GT 735M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 530

The GeForce GT 530 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 662 points. Launch price was $159.

GeForce GT 735M

The GeForce GT 735M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 655 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 530 scores 662 and the GeForce GT 735M reaches 655 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 530 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GT 735M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 530) vs 384 (GeForce GT 735M). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 530) vs 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 735M).

Feature	GeForce GT 530	GeForce GT 735M
G3D Mark Score	662+1%	655
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768+100%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.825 TFLOPS+142%	0.7526 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	48+50%	32
L1 Cache	288 KB+800%	32 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 530	GeForce GT 735M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 530 and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 735M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GT 530) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 735M) — the GeForce GT 530 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 530	GeForce GT 735M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 530) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 735M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce GT 530	GeForce GT 735M
DirectX	12 (11_0)+9%	11.0
OpenGL	4.6+10%	4.2
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GT 530) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 735M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 530) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 735M).

Feature	GeForce GT 530	GeForce GT 735M
Encoder	No NVENC (Fermi)	NVENC 1.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 530 draws 90W versus the GeForce GT 735M's 50W — a 57.1% difference. The GeForce GT 735M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 530) vs 350W (GeForce GT 735M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 530	GeForce GT 735M
TDP	90W	50W-44%
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	7.4	13.1+77%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 530 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GT 530	GeForce GT 735M
MSRP	$100	—
Codename	GM206	GK107
Release	August 20 2015	June 25 2013
Ranking	#425	#726

Search GeForce GT 530 on Amazon

Search GeForce GT 735M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.