GeForce GT 530
Radeon RX Vega 3
GeForce GT 530 vs Radeon RX Vega 3 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 530 vs Radeon RX Vega 3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 530 vs Radeon RX Vega 3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 530
2015Why buy it
- ✅26.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon RX Vega 3 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 530 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌500% higher power demand at 90W vs 15W.
Radeon RX Vega 3
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 90W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 530 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 530 vs Radeon RX Vega 3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GT 530
The GeForce GT 530 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 662 points. Launch price was $159.
Radeon RX Vega 3
The Radeon RX Vega 3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1001 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 684 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 530 scores 662 and the Radeon RX Vega 3 reaches 684 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 530 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 3 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 530) vs 192 (Radeon RX Vega 3). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 530) vs 0.3844 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 3). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 1001 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 662 | 684+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+300% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.825 TFLOPS+375% | 0.3844 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1188 MHz+19% | 1001 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+700% | 4 |
| TMUs | 48+300% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 530 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX Vega 3 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 530 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 3 carries 0 MB. GeForce GT 530 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 530 and System on the Radeon RX Vega 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 530) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 3). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GT 530) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX Vega 3). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 530) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 3).
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No NVENC (Fermi) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 530 draws 90W versus the Radeon RX Vega 3's 15W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 530) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 3). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W | 15W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 250W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 145mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 7.4 | 45.6+516% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 530 came in at $100, while the Radeon RX Vega 3 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega 3 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.6 (GeForce GT 530) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 3) — the Radeon RX Vega 3 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega 3 (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM206 | Picasso |
| Release | August 20 2015 | January 6 2019 |
| Ranking | #425 | #845 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 530 and Radeon RX Vega 3
