GeForce GT 530 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2
GeForce GT 530
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 4700 X2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 530 is positioned at rank 189 and the Quadro FX 4700 X2 is on rank 401, so the GeForce GT 530 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 530
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4700 X2
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GT 530 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The GeForce GT 530 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 530.
| Insight | GeForce GT 530 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 4700 X2 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 36.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 530 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+36.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 530 and Quadro FX 4700 X2
GeForce GT 530
The GeForce GT 530 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 662 points. Launch price was $159.
Quadro FX 4700 X2
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 676 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 530 scores 662 and the Quadro FX 4700 X2 reaches 676 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 530 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 530) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 530) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4700 X2).
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 662 | 676+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+300% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.825 TFLOPS+295% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 48 | 64+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+426% | 0.19 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 530 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GT 530) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the GeForce GT 530 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+426% | 0.19 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 530 draws 90W versus the Quadro FX 4700 X2's 150W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GT 530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 530) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-40% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 7.4+64% | 4.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 530 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 launched at $2999 and now averages $15. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.1 (GeForce GT 530) vs 45.1 (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the Quadro FX 4700 X2 offers 36.3% better value. The GeForce GT 530 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-97% | $2999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $15-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.1 | 45.1+36% |
| Codename | GM206 | GT200B |
| Release | August 20 2015 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #425 | #884 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 530 and Quadro FX 4700 X2
