
GeForce GT 530

GRID K1
GeForce GT 530 vs GRID K1 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 530 vs GRID K1 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GT 530 vs GRID K1: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 530
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,040 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $4,140 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4110% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $4,140 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 225W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 267mm, a 122mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GRID K1
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌4040% HIGHER MSRP$4,140 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($4,140 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 225W vs 90W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 530 vs GRID K1 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 530
The GeForce GT 530 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 662 points. Launch price was $159.

GRID K1
The GRID K1 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 651 points. Launch price was $5,199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 530 scores 662 and the GRID K1 reaches 651 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 530 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GRID K1 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 530) vs 1,536 (GRID K1). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 530) vs 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K1).
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 662+2% | 651 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1536 ×2+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.825 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS ×2+25% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 48 | 128 ×2+167% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB+125% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 530 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K1 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 530 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K1 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 530 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 530 and 64-bit on the GRID K1. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GT 530) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K1) — the GeForce GT 530 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 530) vs 12_0 (GRID K1). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 530 draws 90W versus the GRID K1's 225W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GT 530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 530) vs 350W (GRID K1). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-60% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 7.4+155% | 2.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 530 came in at $100, while the GRID K1 launched at $4140. On MSRP, GeForce GT 530 was 97.6% cheaper ($4040 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.6 (GeForce GT 530) vs 0.2 (GRID K1) — the GeForce GT 530 offers 3200% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 530 (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 530 | GRID K1 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-98% | $4140 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.6+3200% | 0.2 |
| Codename | GM206 | GK104 |
| Release | August 20 2015 | May 11 2013 |
| Ranking | #425 | #611 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














